Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (13901)	8/4/1999 5:50:00 AM
From: MNI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

What I found annoying was the ostinato: "doesn't matter much". It would have been enough to say this twice. OK, that's style. On the other point: OPEC, that was the good ol' times. And it won't happen again. The next (or current?) question is technology that is mainly in the hands of the US. Or should I say, in the hands of MS? One thing is sure, CEOs will not be elected by general, equal and secret ballot, nor will an intracorporational checks-and-balances system be constituted. It may well be however, that corporations start "welfare" for the customer ... You remember what a client-patron relationship in ancient Rome was? Regards MNI.

To: Neocon who wrote (13901)	8/4/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

This brings up a subject that is a minor interest of mine. What objectives should our country pursue in regards our military and intelligence? This is, IMO, the sole pressing issue for the turn of the 20th century. One that is not being addressed by any candidate, nor probably will be. Now I qualify my statements with the disclaimer that I am a civilian, never served, and this is a purely civilian observation and opinion. First, we should increase defence spending and restructure our military priorities. It is highly unlikely the US will be engaged in a major conflict in the coming half century. What is likely is numerous hotspot flarepoints that require massive and quick deployment. I think any adminstration should concentrate on restructuring the military along these lines, similiar to the Marine's own efforts in this regard. We should spend the money necessary to get our equipment and training back up to par. Similiarly, our intelligence community seems to be in a sort of daze. Definately it is being stretched as it is expected to know everything that is going on across the entire globe. We are also more and more dependent upon technical means of intelligence at the expense of ground operatives. Along with the military, we should set our priorities for the intelligence community. What are the most pressing threats to national security, and concentrate on that factor. Third, I think Kosovo has pointed out the weakness in US foreign policy over the past decade. Cold and calculated though it may be, lets get back to purely national interest. And lets stop poking at the wounded Bear. Stop flirting with Caspian and Baltic countries that Russia considers its own, and that we are hardly in a position to defend. Overstretch is a dangerous state of affairs for any polity, whether that be one with Roman Legions or B1 nuclear bombers. IMO Derek