SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Liatris Spicata who wrote (9030)8/4/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9980
 
This may be the last change we get to do a preemptive strike on N Korea and wipe out this vipers nest. We need to do whatever it takes to get China to at least not object to it. Give them favored trade status, money or the whole damn peninsula if that's what it takes.

This is an end of the world class problem.

N. KOREA WARNS: 'NO GUARANTEE FOR SAFETY OF U.S. MAINLAND'

North Korea's official news agency on Tuesday warned that there is "no guarantee for the safety of the U.S. mainland when the U.S. ignites a war against the north in the Korean peninsula."

The threat came on the same day North Korea acknowledged for the first time that it is preparing to test a missile.

U.S. military officials now believe that North Korea could, within the next few weeks, test a Taepodong 2 missile -- a powerful new rocket with a range of 3,800 to 6,000 miles that would put Alaska or Hawaii within its reach.

"Whether we test-fire a satellite or a missile is a legitimate, independent right to be exercised by a sovereign state," the Korean Central News Agency stated.

The United States has threatened to use "all available means" if North Korea goes ahead with a Taepodong 2 test.

Wednesday's NEW YORK TIMES, which leads with a N. Korea story, runs quotes predicting that if a Korean missile should fall in Japanese territory, and particularly cause casualties or some destruction, Japan, with the help of the U.S., could then "destroy North Korean missile sites".

In the war of words, the Korean Central News Agency warns: "A war on the Korean peninsula is neither a war like a military drill of unilateral offensive as in Yugoslavia and Iraq nor a dispute like a simple conflict. A war here is a large thermo-nuclear war in which more than a thousand nuclear bombs with explosive power of 13,000 kilotons deployed in South Korea will go off and a world war which will soon escalate beyond the Korean peninsula."

drudgereport.com



To: Liatris Spicata who wrote (9030)8/4/1999 9:00:00 PM
From: Ron Bower  Respond to of 9980
 
Larry,

Times article-
You said, "I am reminded to Alexander Solzhenitzyn's claim that it would have been better had the US not given the Soviet Union assistance (primarily the Lend/Lease program) after WWI"

THis is why I was so surprised to hear on Washington Week that NORTH Korea is the largest SEA recipient of US Foreign Aid. Were it not for that aid...

Ron