Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (11098)	8/4/1999 4:22:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14226

Scott, three things, first, the report itself, it is very similar to what tens of reports we have received in the same vein in the last three years? What is new? IUn the old times we used to get 3 oz/ton of gold, now just .81, the same with the other numbers, thus I still feel that without a third party verification, I for one cannot put much credence in this report. We have heard it too many times, and the wolves were not there. Difference in extraction between the slime and precipitates makes a l;arge difference as you noted yourself, add to that that Twifford probably does not carry two "experiments" the same way further complexes the issue. If that is not enough, the whole inquarting business in the precipitation process smells to high heaven, particularly if one attempts to precipitate all the goodies in one process (it probably should not work and it should be a two process system, but of course, I forgot about the "catalyst". Lat, the major resistance on the way up is at $.21 and unless this is taken with vengeance, I would have to describe the last release as another pump which will be followed shortly with a dump. Addendum added prior to proof, how come this release is coming from Jensen and not McKay? Is Mike out of the picture? Voluntarily, forcibly or in disgust kind of throwing the towel in the ring? Zeev

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (11098)	8/4/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: Ed Fishbaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Scott From the level of the English it is clear that Jensen did not write the recent news release. But he signed it. Why did McKay not sign it? Would you not think that it was offered to him to sign? Does he refuse to underwrite Twiford's assays? Why did he do so before? I love the numbers reported but how can one trust them? Robert told me 10 days ago that 3rd party verification would be in hand in 2-3 days. Today he told me that well within 2 weeks they would have 3rd party verification. Who supplied quantities of the stock today? It does not seem like it was mainly the market makers because they never picked up quantity below the current price. If the inside people are selling in order to provide funds to operate that's ok with me. If its plain dumping--- bad news. Many uncertainties. I admire your polyanism and wish I could share it. Ed