SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (67637)8/4/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: DRBES  Respond to of 1577188
 
re: "The chip, which was to be announced in September at 400MHz, 450MHz and 500MHz clock speeds, has been pushed back about a month to late October or possibly early November, the sources said."

Gooolly! And just who the hell does iNTEL think it is? AMD?

Regards,

DARBES



To: Mani1 who wrote (67637)8/4/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577188
 
<I guess Intel finaly pushed too hard.>
They call it "roadblocks".

I especially like this:

"The challenge is getting the design to run at the full frequency," Intel spokesman Howard High told PC Week in June.

I wonder what does "full frequency" mean?
The 0.18 um was expected to run at 1200MHz,
is not it?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News