To: gc who wrote (1257 ) 8/4/1999 6:46:00 PM From: Phil Respond to of 1754
Found on Raging Bull: Cut & Pasted in entirety Phil By: sullman Reply To: None Wednesday, 4 Aug 1999 at 6:10 PM EDT Post # of 797 From an Eye MD. I would like to comment on some issues that have recently been discussed on this board regarding Keravision. I am an EyeMD that has extensive experience with refractive surgery. This includes RK, PRK, and LASIK. I have NOT placed intacs. There is a lot of misinformation going around about refractive surgery and pricing. 1. Laser surgery is as invasive as any other procedure and LASIK is in my opinion the MOST invasive of the current refractive surgery modalities (PRK, LASIK, Intacs, and intraocular lenses). 2. LASIK requires the same sterility and basic setup as INTACs. LASIK and the intacs will be done mostly in a doctors office if he has a busy refractive practice. 3. There is a lot of misinformation in terms of cost. The use of the two current lasers (VisX and Summit) have a Pillar Point fee of $250 per eye. This is just an additional charge and has nothing to do with other expenses (material, maintenance and cost of laser, surgery suite charges, etc). There is NO question that if you include the cost of the laser and maintenance that Intacs is more profitable than LASIK for the far majority of Eye MD's 4. The sucess and/or failure of this company and its stock will be on the success of the procedure. There is tremendous patient interest for a refractive procedure that is safe, effective and reversible. LASIK cannot offer you the later. Eye MD's who want to provide their patients services desired will be forced to adopt this technology or lose their patients. This will include the EyeMDs that have a large investment in their own laser. 5. Lastly, it is very important that the Intacs gets FDA approval for an increased range of corrections. Currently, they are approved for up to a - 3.00. I believe they are submitting data to get approval up to -5.00. This would greatly increase the number of patients that could potentially benefit from this technology. I would like to stress to everyone I am long this stock. (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)