SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J.T. who wrote (388)8/5/1999 10:14:00 AM
From: J.T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
MORE EVIDENCE FOR MR. G TO RAISE 1/4 ONE LAST TIME?:

THIS FROM BLOOMBERG:

"First-time jobless claims rose 4,000 to a seasonally
adjusted 279,000 for the week ended July 31, the Labor Department
said. That's following the previous week's drop of 40,000 to
275,000. Even with the rise, last week's level was still the
second lowest in two years.

Moreover, The four-week average for new claims, which
smoothes out the volatile weekly data, fell to 295,000 last week
-- the lowest level since the week ended March 27 -- from a
300,000 the previous week.
''Any number below 300,000 indicates a very taut'' labor
market,'' said Lynn Reaser, an economist with Bank of
America Private Bank in Jacksonville, Florida. More important,
''this is going to make the Federal Reserve very nervous if
claims persist at these levels,'' said Suzanne Rizzo, chief U.S.
economist at Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc. in New York.


Fed policy-makers have been watching to see
whether the economy is growing at pace that might accelerate
inflation, and the labor supply is one measure."

Here is the complete link:

quote.bloomberg.com

The stock market is fearing the 1/4 hike and asking if more is to come.
The bond market is already looking past this and realizes Mr. G's work is done raising rates one last time. Hence bonds are a screaming.


Best, J.T.




To: J.T. who wrote (388)8/6/1999 12:53:00 AM
From: J.T.  Respond to of 19219
 
Here is a link from Bloomberg for Friday's estimated employment report:

quote.bloomberg.com

And some clippings for Mr. G and the markets from Bloomberg:

Investors will watch the employment figures to gauge whether
the job market is so strong it could spark rising inflation and
lead Federal Reserve policy-makers to raise interest rates at
their next meeting on Aug. 24.

Greenspan Comments

If the nation's unemployment rate falls any further than the
4.2 percent to 4.3 percent rate of recent months, that would be
''one indication that inflation risks were rising,'' Fed Chairman
Alan Greenspan said during his economic report to Congress last
week.


Employment costs accelerated in the second quarter as demand
for labor stayed strong. The employment cost index rose 1.1
percent in the second quarter, the largest quarterly increase in
eight years. While the second-quarter employment costs figure
sparked concerns of rising inflation, the second-quarter index
followed a 0.4 percent first-quarter increase that was the
smallest on record.

Watching Productivity

After languishing at about 1 percent in the 1970s and 1980s,
productivity growth has been above 2 percent the past three
years, helping to contain inflation. Yesterday, though figures
showed that productivity slowed in the second quarter, and labor
costs climbed at the fastest pace in 1 1/2 years, signs the chief
safeguard against inflation may be weakening.

Non-farm productivity rose at a 1.3 percent annual rate in
the second quarter after a first-quarter pace of 3.6 percent, the
Labor Department said. In addition, unit labor costs -- which
measure changes in worker compensation -- rose at a 3.8 percent
annual rate, the fastest since fourth quarter 1997.

If productivity continues to slow, companies may have to
raise prices to pay for the higher salaries of their workers, and
that could set off a rise in inflation.


The dollar fell to as low as 113.60 yen yesterday in New
York, its lowest since Feb. 11. Each one-yen fall in the value of
the dollar means companies such as Toyota lose several billion
yen in operating profit.

Compounding those worries, statistics released yesterday
indicate U.S. productivity may not be gaining enough to curb
labor costs, increasing concern interest rates may rise and
restrict U.S. economic growth, which may result in less demand
for foreign products.


Best, J.T.




To: J.T. who wrote (388)8/6/1999 1:12:00 AM
From: J.T.  Respond to of 19219
 
GREENSPAN Equation: Lower productivity gains + higher labor costs + lower unemployment rates = 1/4 point rate hike. His work is then finished for the year. No more rate hikes.

I have boldened certain areas of interest in the report.

Another Bloomberg special:

U.S. 2nd-Qtr Non-Farm Productivity Rose at 1.3% Rate (Update2)
By Vince Golle

U.S. 2nd-Qtr Non-Farm Productivity Rose at 1.3% Rate (Update2)
(Adds closing financial markets in 10th paragraph.)

Washington, Aug. 5 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. worker productivity
rose at a smaller-than-expected rate in the second quarter, and
labor costs grew at their quickest pace in more than a year,
government figures showed today.


Non-farm productivity rose at a 1.3 percent annual rate in
the second quarter after a revised first-quarter pace of 3.6
percent, the Labor Department said. In addition, unit labor costs
-- which measures changes in worker compensation -- rose 3.8
percent, the fastest pace since a 4.1 percent rise in the fourth
quarter of 1997.

''This is one of the results of having tight labor markets
for some time,'' said Steve Wood, an economist at Banc of America
Securities LLC in San Francisco. Earlier today, the government
reported jobless claims last week moved to their second-lowest
level in two years.

The report could ''be a little worrisome'' to Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who suggested in congressional
testimony last week the country cannot expect to sustain high
levels of productivity indefinitely, said Chris Rupkey, senior
financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. in New York.

Still, ''I don't think this would show productivity, the
technology-based gains, are disappearing or rapidly eroding,''
Rupkey said. ''It's a one-quarter aberration.''

When compared with a year earlier, gains in productivity
still show stronger and increases in labor costs are less
pronounced.

Productivity rose 2.9 percent compared with the second
quarter of last year, the best year-over-year showing in three
years, Labor Department figures show. Unit labor costs increased
1.4 percent, close to the 1.3 percent year-over-year in the first
quarter. It's also below the 2 percent pace for all of last year.

Before the report, economists expected a 1.9 percent
increase in non-farm productivity for the second quarter, down
from the 3.5 percent first-quarter increase originally reported.

Analysts expected a 2.2 percent rise in unit labor costs for
the second quarter after a revised 0.8 percent increase in the
first three months of the year.

In financial markets, bonds rose as investors turned to the
safety of government securities instead of corporate securities.
Many companies are offering new issues before next year in case a
Year 2000 computer glitch damps demand. The price on the
government's 30-year benchmark Treasury bond rose 21/32, pushing
down the yield 5 basis points to 6.05 percent. The Dow Jones
Industrial Average rose 119.05 points, or 1.1 percent, to close
at 10793.82.

Hours worked rose 1.1 percent annual rate, after increasing
1.3 percent in the first quarter, while output increased at a 2.4
percent rate after a first-quarter gain of 5 percent.

Hourly wages adjusted for inflation rose at a 1.5 percent
annual rate in the second quarter following a 2.9 percent first-
quarter gain.

Price Deflator

The implicit price deflator -- a measure of inflation tied
to the productivity report -- rose at a 1.6 percent rate in the
second quarter after a 1.3 percent gain during the first three
months of the year.

Additionally, unit non-labor payments, which include such
items as taxes and rental payments, fell at a 2.3 percent rate in
the second quarter after a 2.4 percent gain in the first quarter.

For all of last year, productivity increased 2.2 percent.

Earlier today, the Labor Department reported the number of
first-time jobless claims rose 4,000 to 279,000 last week, the
second lowest level in two years.

Advances in productivity -- calculated as an index of worker
output per hour -- let companies such as Minnesota, Manufacturing
& Mining Co. reduce costs and boost sales. 3M's earnings per
share rose 9.6 percent in the second quarter compared with the
same three months in 1998, the company announced last month,
citing ''ongoing productivity improvement'' as reason.

Greenspan

Increases in worker productivity and business efficiency are
important reasons the economy can expand, and wages can rise,
without inflation accelerating. Companies have invested heavily
in computers and other innovations to boost efficiency and reduce
costs.

It's become ''increasingly evident'' increases in
productivity growth are holding down inflationary pressures,
Greenspan said in congressional testimony last week.


After languishing at about 1 percent in the 1970s and 1980s,
productivity growth has been above 2 percent the past three
years. It's exceeded that pace over the past five of the six
quarters, Labor figures showed.

Still, ''should the increments of gains in technology that
have fostered productivity slow, any extant pressures in the
labor market should ultimately show through to product prices,''
Greenspan said.

That's why investors will watch tomorrow's employment
figures for July to gauge whether employment conditions are so
strong that they could spark inflation and lead Fed policy-makers
to raise interest rates at this month's meeting.

If the nation's unemployment rate falls any further than the
4.2 percent to 4.3 percent rate of recent months, that would be
''one indication that inflation risks were rising,'' Greenspan
told Congress.
''There can be little doubt that, if the pool of job seekers
shrinks sufficiently, upward pressures on wage costs are
inevitable,'' Greenspan said. ''Such cost increases have
invariably presaged rising inflation in the past, and presumably
would in the future, which would threaten the economic
expansion.''


©1999 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved

Best, J.T.