Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : VISX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: capitalistbeatnik who wrote (1260)	8/5/1999 1:25:00 AM
From: Phil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1754

You said>>> Now you are scaring patients, and while I could give a damn whether KERA goes up or down, it does bother me that you are using junk science and hysteria to scare good people.<<< You are a liar. A review of your posts on the Raging Bull Board will show that you first put in an appearance at Visx right at the time of KERA approval. Before that your had only a few posts in defense of Phillip Morris. >>>The BBC study involved RK and PRK and black box lasers. There is NO EVIDENCE that VISX lasers are used.<<< At least the last sentence is correct. There is no statement regarding VISX or any other mfg. You are LYING when you state that the BBC study involved RK and PRK and black box lasers, with the intention of creating the impression that the article excludes Lasik. The article makes no such exclusion. In fact, it clearly states that the study includes the most modern technology. >>>Secondly, surgical eyes (that's www.surgicaleyes.com {phil})is mostly RK and PRK and a few people who obviously had lousy surgeons. If this were a big problem there would obvioulsy be more complaints among the over million people who have had the procedure done.<<< I refer readers to the web site and encourage them to make their own decisions. >>>I will be contacting VISX IR and notifying them that you are trying to scare people away from a safe and effective procedure in a futile attempt to bolster a competitors stock.<<< PLEASE!!!!! Let them know that the "no slice" option is getting attention! >>>And as far as the effectiveness studies on your home built web page, that is right out of the KERA propaganda machine. There is no double blind study to indicate that Intacs are superior to LASIK. NONE.<<< My page serves one purpose, it links to original sources such as Review of Ophthomology, Slack and others. As I have repeatedly challenged you. Post ONE idoc that states in a peer reviewed pub that LASIK is superior to Intacs. ONE!!! My website home.att.net or home.att.net will point you to MANY IDOCS that state Intacs are superior to LASIK. >>>As long as you are all over the web spreading lies to hype KERA I will dog you until you start telling the truth.<<< HERE POOCH, COME ON....HERE IS A NICE KERABONE... Best to you, Phil