Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Fatty's Donut Shop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KZAP who wrote (2829)	8/5/1999 9:14:00 AM
From: Jorjenzak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5041

Which part...or all or it??? Please clarify....imho the fact ECNC got screwed yesterday by someone else's error on their SEC compliance SUCKS BIGTIME and deserves compensation for damages suffered. Tom advised an RB thread member that NASD (I believe, could be remembering wrong) ADMITTED it was THEIR F##cking fault...excuse my language but that mess yesterday just about killed me. UN#######BELIEVABLE!!!!! Don't get me started..........

To: KZAP who wrote (2829)	8/5/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: Jorjenzak	Respond to of 5041

Tom's response to one of the RB board members: Thanks for your letter. 1. The actual announcement of our business plans will be published in a joint press release next week. We have all agreed to not release any details until then. The present 2 recipients who have seen the actual documents are people who I personally know and have met with. 2. As regards the E label. We filed our name change and fiscal to calendar reporting with the SEC in an 8K which you can easily read by accessing www.sec.gov and then entering eConnect. This is a case of the left hand of NASD not knowing what the right hand of the SEC is doing. NASD has agreed that they have made a mistake and will correct it. Tom How 'bout that in your FACE, HUH!!!! (not directed to anyone...just spouting off some aggression tendencies here :^])