SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (51)8/18/1999 2:25:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
ZiaSun Sues Its Online Critics As Posts Get Nasty And Personal

By AARON ELSTEIN
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL INTERACTIVE EDITION

August 13, 1999

Even by the standards of the rough-and-tumble world of Internet message boards, where posters vent their feelings without restraint, the dispute between ZiaSun Technologies and its online detractors looks ugly.

To its critics, the small Internet holding company based in San Diego is all hype and no substance.

They believe its press releases promise more than can be delivered and a big rally in its stock is destined to fail. One poster described ZiaSun as "scum." Another called its executives "conning, lying, thieving rubes." Others are more personal, mentioning the wife and daughter of the company's president, Anthony Tobin, and suggesting ZiaSun executives are pornographers.

But ZiaSun says its critics are nothing more than misguided short sellers aiming to depress its stock. It has sued eight of them in federal court in Seattle -- including one it says is a San Francisco money manager. The lawsuit, filed June 24, accused the posters of conducting a "defamatory campaign" and acting "with a reckless disregard for the truth."

The dispute has been playing out since late March after ZiaSun, once an unsuccessful beverage bottler called Bestway U.S.A. that's trying to reshape itself into an Internet company, issued a series of press releases promoting its new focus. The releases compared ZiaSun to popular Internet venture firm CMGI and said ZiaSun operated an online brokerage firm called Swiftrade.

Those announcements helped shares of ZiaSun, which trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, surge fivefold to 35. They also attracted a lot of unkind attention for ZiaSun on online message boards. Online critics, including the eight people ZiaSun has sued, have posted thousands of messages on bulletin boards run by Silicon Investor (www.techstocks.com) and Raging Bull (www.ragingbull.com) attacking the company.

The posters, many using anonymous screen names, questioned the company's legitimacy as an Internet concern and statements that it operated Swiftrade. ZiaSun has since backpedaled on the brokerage issue. ZiaSun acknowledged it does not operate Swiftrade. It owns the name of the Web site, but the brokering operations are conducted by a firm called West America Securities Corp. ZiaSun collects a royalty for referring customers to West America via Swiftrade.

The former bottling company has promoted its new business mix of Internet companies to investors in a press release headlined, "ZiaSun Takes CMGI Strategy to the Next Level," a reference to the well-known financier of such companies asLycos. A ZiaSun executive also paid 50,000 shares to a stock promoter called Interactive Business Channel to write a positive report about the company.

The report compared ZiaSun's e-mail service, Pinmail, to Microsoft's Hotmail, and its financial Web site, Mfinance.com, to Marketwatch.com. Hotmail has 40 million users; Pinmail was just launched. Mfinance has six full and part-time employees in its Hong Kong office; Marketwatch.com has 50 full-time staff in New York, San Francisco, London, and Tokyo.

In the weeks following the paid promotion, ZiaSun's shares got caught in the wave that drove up scores of Internet-related stocks. But then the message-board writers started to pummel the company. ZiaSun Chairman D. Scott Elder said the company did not authorize paying shares to the stock promoter and the executive who did so has since left the company. Interactive Business Channel, which is based in Irvine, Calif., did not return phone calls.

ZiaSun's critics have found many issues to hammer. Their postings have grown increasingly nastier and in some instances very personal. "ZSUN IS scum and must die. I shall make it so," wrote "Auric Goldfinger," a message writer alleged by ZiaSun to be a San Francisco hedge fund manager and former investment banker named Steve Worthington.

Mr. Worthington declined to comment on whether he is "Auric Goldfinger."

Auric Goldfinger was the first to disclose that ZiaSun was former beverage bottler Bestway U.S.A. The message writer also has posted a message that ZiaSun considers threatening. It contains a link to a Web site showing individual photos of some family members of Mr. Tobin, ZiaSun's president. The message reads: "We want your wife! Where is she? Oh well Michelle will do in a pinch." Michelle is Mr. Tobin's daughter.

Besides Mr. Worthington, other people named in ZiaSun's lawsuit include: Floyd Schneider of Saddle River, N.J., who uses the aliases of "Flodyie" or "Truthseeker," Mike Morelock of Greenwood, Ark., known on Silicon Investor as "C M Burns" and message writers using the aliases jjs64, trader14u, realmoney and Alpine Sleuth. Alpine Sleuth is an investor named George Joakimidis from Athens, Greece.

Mr. Morelock, Mr. Schneider, and Mr. Joakimidis contend ZiaSun is trying to intimidate them to stop revealing damaging allegations about the company with its lawsuit.

Mr. Schneider, a particularly relentless online critic, has suggested that ZiaSun management are online pornographers. He also accused the company of trying to dupe investors "WATCH OUT NEWBIES, these conning, lying, thieving rubes are trying to get more CHUMPS into these stock to bail them out of their massive losses," Mr. Schneider wrote in one of his postings.

ZiaSun officials are infuriated by the online attacks. Mr. Elder said the repeated attacks were deterring shareholders and hurting the company, which said it earned 11 cents per share last year. Shortly after reaching its 35 peak in late March, ZiaSun's share price started to fall. On Friday, the stock was trading at 9 1/8, after accounting for a 2-for-1 stock split.

ZiaSun's lawsuit, a growing tactic by companies to silence their online critics, followed a bulletin-board message from Mr. Tobin in early April, warning detractors that the company was considering legal action if people did not stop posting "outright lies." But that didn't stop the criticism, so the company filed its suit.

"Not responding to the charges could have been taken to mean that they were true," said Mr. Elder. He said ZiaSun is willing to settle for an apology from all of the defendants in the lawsuit except Mr. Worthington, the man the company alleges was behind the message mentioning Mr. Tobin's wife. "He crossed the line from being critical to threatening," Mr. Elder said.

ZiaSun, which owns several Internet-related businesses, is no stranger to Internet criticism. The company has also sued Stock Detective, a financial Web site (www.stockdetective.com), for listing ZiaSun as a "stinky stock." The lawsuit alleged Stock Detective painted a very negative and inaccurate picture of ZiaSun.

Until last September, ZiaSun was known as Bestway U.S.A. and its primary business was developing a machine that lets people bottle their own drinks in supermarkets. But the venture failed and last fall the company renamed itself ZiaSun and bought a variety of Internet portals and e-commerce sites, many of which are based in Hong Kong and the Philippines.

In April it acquired Online Investors Advantage Inc., an Orem, Utah, firm that teaches novice investors sophisticated investment strategies, such as options trading. The company plans to start offering the classes in Australia and New Zealand, where Mr. Elder said it will start "introducing" students to Swiftrade.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Write to Aaron Elstein at: aaron.elstein@news.wsj.com

interactive.wsj.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (51)9/7/2000 11:26:01 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 7/10/00 - [SNMM] Starnet Obtains Judgment Against Claude Levy and Gambling Magazine

Starnet Obtains Judgment Against Claude Levy and Gambling Magazine

ST. JOHNS, Antigua, Jul 10, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Starnet Communications International Inc. (OTC-BB: "SNMM" chart, msgs) ("Starnet"), an online provider of interactive media and information systems and a recognized leader in Internet gaming, today announced that the Commercial Court in Mons, Belgium (where Mr. Levy apparently resides) has, in the party's absence, entered a default judgment against Claude Levy, Gambling Magazine and Starnet News. The judgment orders Levy, Gambling Magazine and Starnet News to cease using the name Starnet or any other name resembling Starnet, and to cease making defamatory accusations against Starnet on the Internet. Any violation of these orders will result in a penalty of 100,000 BF per day as of the date of notification of the judgment. The Court also ordered Mr. Levy to publish the judgment on the Gambling Magazine and Starnet News Websites' homepages for an uninterrupted period of fifteen days as of the date of notification of the judgment. Any violation of this order will also carry a penalty of 100,000 BF per day as of the date of notification of the judgment. Finally, the Court has granted Starnet the right to publish the judgment at Mr. Levy's expense in any two newspapers or trade magazines.

Meldon Ellis, president and chief executive officer of Starnet, said, "We are very pleased with the Court's decision and believe it reflects the high quality and integrity of Starnet's operations and all Starnet employees. We remain extremely confident in our litigation strategy and legal team representing Starnet and we will continue to work methodically through each of the legal issues the company faces."

 About Starnet

Starnet is a leading developer and producer of Internet technologies for gaming applications. Products currently offered and under development comprise a full suite of gaming products, including casinos, sports betting, bingo, lotto, and horse racing. Games are available in a number of different formats including Java, C++, and HTML and comprehensive marketing support software is also provided. For more information, please visit www.snmm.com or email sales@starnetsystems.net.

Starnet is a fully reporting US (Delaware) corporation, which currently trades on the National Association of Security Dealers ("NASD") Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. The company began trading in September of 1997 under the symbol "SNMM". Starnet is also listed on the Berlin Stock Exchange where it is traded on the Over-The-Counter market under the symbol "SNM".

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, certain delays in testing and evaluation of products and other risks detailed from time to time in Starnet's filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:

Starnet Communications International Inc.
 Carey Nelson, Investor Relations Manager
 Ph: (604) 608-1818 Fax: (604) 608-6163
 Rob Grace, Investor Relations Manager
 Ph: (604) 608-8733 Fax: (604) 608-6163
 North American Toll - 1-888-883-0833
 Outside N. America - 800-883-88338
 Email - ir@snmm.com
 or
 Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide
 Brad Miller
 Ph: (212) 880-5345



siliconinvestor.com

=====

The Starnet News website may be viewed at:
starnetnews.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (51)7/22/2005 7:30:34 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 7/21/05 - [SNMM] World Gaming predecessor Starnet players sanctioned

World Gaming predecessor Starnet players sanctioned
2005-07-21 20:53 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

by Lee M. Webb

World Gaming PLC predecessor Vancouver-based Starnet Communications International Inc. players, including three Canadians, have been dealt some hefty sanctions by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In addition to various cease and desist orders and bans, the July 18 initial decision of Administrative Law Judge James T. Kelly orders the disgorgement of millions of dollars made by dumping unregistered Starnet shares into the U.S. market.

Former Starnet chief financial officer and chairman of the board of directors John Carley, who lived in Delta, B.C., before relocating to Antigua, is ordered to cease and desist from violations of U.S. securities regulations and to disgorge $4.18-million. (All amounts are in U.S. dollars.)

Starnet's former secretary, treasurer, director and in-house counsel Christopher Zacharias, a former Port Moody, B.C., resident now living in Costa Rica, is subject to a similar cease and desist order and an order to disgorge $1.45-million.

Vancouver resident Roy Gould, vice-president of United Capital Securities and a key figure in other Howe Street promotions linked to Starnet's former chief executive officer Mark Dohlen, is also subject to a cease and desist order and is barred from any association with any U.S. broker or dealer.

Mr. Gould was further ordered to disgorge more than $13.8-million and tagged with a $500,000 civil penalty.

Because of a demonstrated inability to pay based on sworn personal financial records that show a net worth of less than $2-million and an annual income "in the low-to-mid six figures," as well as the lack of any evidence of assets hidden abroad, Mr. Gould's civil penalty was waived and the disgorgement amount was reduced to $1-million.

U.S. brokers Eugene Geiger and Thomas Kaufmann, who handled the offending Starnet trading through brokerage Spencer Edwards Inc., also drew cease and desist orders and were barred from associating with any broker or dealer.

Mr. Geiger and Mr. Kaufmann were each ordered to disgorge $885,738. In addition, Mr. Geiger drew a civil penalty of $400,000 and Mr. Kaufmann was slapped with a $300,000 civil penalty.

Spencer Edwards was censured, ordered to disgorge $759,204 and tagged with a $200,000 civil penalty.

Because of its demonstrated inability to pay and because Judge Kelly reasoned that if the SEC was not going to openly shutter Spencer Edwards, then he was not going to drive it out of business through the back door, the $200,000 civil penalty against the evidently near-penniless brokerage firm was waived and the disgorgement was reduced to a modest $25,000.

Edward Price, a 45-per-cent owner of Spencer Edwards and supervisor of Mr. Geiger and Mr. Kaufmann, was not booted out of the industry entirely, but he is barred from associating with any broker or dealer in a supervisory capacity.

Mr. Price was also ordered to pay a civil penalty of $150,000.

In an earlier ruling against another respondent in the case, Le Fond Mondial D'Investissement S.A., Judge Kelly issued a default judgment ordering the British Virgin Islands company headquartered in Spain to disgorge more than $10.4-million in ill-gotten gains made by dumping unregistered Starnet shares into the U.S. market.

While Judge Kelly's Nov. 23, 2004, $10.4-million judgment against Le Fond Mondial and the July 18 disgorgement orders and penalties totaling more than $23.5-million before being reduced to approximately $9.27-million are certainly significant, the SEC cannot claim complete success in the proceeding.

Quite apart from the $14-million reduction in the disgorgement orders and penalties against the respondents and the open question of just how much of ordered payments the U.S. regulator will ever collect, the SEC failed to prove some significant allegations and drew some rather sharp criticisms from Judge Kelly.

Moreover, the SEC was reportedly unable to serve three key respondents with its Sept. 1, 2004, order instituting proceedings (OIP) and had to obtain an order severing them from the case on Jan. 3.

The SEC has still not been able to serve Starnet's former chief executive officer, Vancouver promoter Mark Dohlen. Mr. Dohlen allegedly pocketed millions of dollars through his participation in the scheme to unload unregistered stock.

Indeed, while Celestine Asset Management, a company controlled by Mr. Gould, reportedly unloaded more than $25-million worth of Starnet shares, the SEC reduced its demand for disgorgement by more than $7-million because some of that money was disbursed to other parties and Judge Kelly reduced it by a further $5.25-million because of documented evidence of further third party disbursements.

Among other things, the judge determined that $2-million from the Celestine transactions had been paid to Mr. Dohlen and a further $1.58-million had been disbursed to "Dohlen and the Coziers" for an account at Mr. Gould's United Capital.

Starnet's former president, Vancouverite Paul A. Giles, who was believed to be living somewhere in Florida at the time the SEC instituted proceedings, has also yet to be served. Mr. Giles also allegedly profited from the sale of unregistered Starnet shares.

Rounding out the list of key respondents that the U.S. regulator has not been able to locate for service is Alfred Peeper, a citizen of the Netherlands believed to be living somewhere in Spain. Mr. Peeper allegedly controlled, at least nominally, many of the offshore entities that unloaded unregistered Starnet shares, including Le Fond Mondial.

It remains to be seen whether the SEC will eventually succeed in serving the three severed respondents and possibly fill in some of the gaps regarding the offshore entities and the share-dumping scheme, not to mention provide an opportunity for Mr. Dohlen, Mr. Giles and Mr. Peeper to respond to the allegations.

"Many of the relevant transactions were conducted through corporations, partnerships and trusts in the South Pacific, the Caribbean, Ireland, Luxembourg, Hong Kong and elsewhere," Judge Kelly noted in the preface to his findings of fact. "Many of the officers, directors, shareholders and beneficial owners of these entities remain unknown.

"Three of the eleven respondents were not served with the OIP and did not testify at the hearing.

"The result is an evidentiary record with sketchy and inconsistent details.

"The parties attempt to fill these gaps, sometimes with assumptions and sometimes with reasonable inferences from known facts."

Stockwatch will review Judge Kelly's 84-page decision in more detail in a future article. Notwithstanding the sketchy and inconsistent evidentiary record, the July 18 decision offers some intriguing insights into the setup of the Vancouver-spawned promotion, including the early distribution of millions of cheap shares to offshore entities, and the operation of the complex and illegal share-dumping scheme.

Stockwatch will also recap some of Starnet's history including the headline-grabbing and price-collapsing Aug. 20, 1999, predawn raid on the company's Vancouver office and the homes of several of its officers and directors by 100 law enforcement officials, the quick head office relocation to Antigua and the subsequent reorganization as World Gaming.

World Gaming obtained a listing on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange on May 17. AIM-listed companies are arguably burdened with far less oversight than the lightly regulated but heavily prosecuted OTC Bulletin Board.

World Gaming shares also continue to change hands on the OTC-BB where the recent SEC decision has apparently had no effect on the company's stock price. Indeed, perhaps based partly on speculation about a pending acquisition, the volume and price have jumped over the past three days.

With 423,183 shares changing hands on the OTC-BB, World Gaming added 12 cents to bring its three-day gain to 30 cents and closed at $1.62 on July 21.

Comments regarding this article may be sent to lwebb@stockwatch.com.

stockwatch.com