Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator from New York? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Starduster234 who wrote (822)	8/6/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: C Kahn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3389

Starduster, I realize your comment was not directed to me, but I would like to state my opinion. I think that the people who believe the Bible are going to believe it. And the people who don't believe it won't. No matter how much evidence is presented either for it or against it.

To: Starduster234 who wrote (822)	8/6/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: truedog	Respond to of 3389

to: Starduster from: truedog Revisions is not exactly the correct word to use. The first Bibles were based on translations the were very iffy because of the language differences and symbolic meanings. The King James Version was written to please a human on the throne of England. There is no telling what liberties were taken to please him. Todays Bibles are the result of new and more accurate translation techniques and give a much clearer concept of the original ideals involved. My Bible, one of the very latest, still covers the symbolism but writes them in language, more readily understood by todays people. Be that as it may, if you don't want to believe in the Bible, that is your choice. Just leave me to my beliefs. TD