Amazon.com ? 2 August 1999 3 revenue, and 2) the company?s existing customers are buying less per customer than they did in comparable quarters last year and the year before. As will be discussed below, both of these trends were expected, and neither means that our aggressive projections for Amazon.com?s future growth (which call for revenue of $3 billion in 2000 and $10 billion in 2003) are necessarily too optimistic. For the company to achieve these projections, however, the second of these trends?declining revenue per customer? will have to stabilize or reverse itself within the next 12-18 months. If it doesn?t, we will almost certainly have to trim our aggressive forecasts. Flattening customer acquisition velocity?and increasing customer acquisition cost. There are two basic drivers of Amazon?s revenue: number of customers and revenue per customer. For all of the company?s history thus far, the number of new customers added in each successive quarter has increased significantly (better than 20%) each quarter, allowing the company to maintain strong revenue growth even as revenue-per-customer has declined. In Q2, however, the number of new customers added was only 5% greater than the number added in Q1 (versus 36% last year), and we would not be surprised to see the number of new customers added decline for the first time in the company?s history in Q3. As a result of flattening of new customer growth, existing customers are contributing a greater percentage of the company?s revenue each quarter. Existing customers contribute less revenue per customer than new customers (because the average existing customer makes a purchase less than once a quarter, whereas all new customers?by virtue of being new customers?make exactly one purchase per quarter), and the mix is contributing to a decline in overall revenue per customer. At the same time, Amazon?s customer acquisition cost appears to be increasing (our estimates suggest that it rose from $13 to about $20 from Q1 to Q2?the lowest in the industry, but almost the highest it has ever been), so the slowdown in new customer acquisition is not likely to be rectified by increased investments in marketing. Based on the last quarter, we think it is likely that Amazon.com is reaching a point where the growth of new customers will stabilize in the 2 million ? 2.5 million range?a prodigious rate of growth, but a flattening in the trajectory. Declining revenue per customer, both new and existing. We model Amazon?s business in part by tracking and projecting quarterly revenue per customer, a metric that we regard as being similar to the same-store-sales metric in traditional retailing. On a year-over-year basis, revenue per customer has been declining for the past two years?a trend that we expected and are not necessarily concerned about (we will discuss the reasons for this decline below). For the company to hit our aggressive projections, however, and begin to benefit from the leverage inherent in spreading customer acquisition cost across multiple product lines, revenue per customer must stabilize and then begin to increase within the next 12-18 months. If it doesn?t, our aggressive projections will prove to be too high. To really understand the revenue-per-customer dynamic, it is necessary to divide Amazon?s customers into two groups?new and existing (new customers are those that make their first purchase within the period in question). Of these, the far more important group is existing customers, as the new customers will continue to constitute a smaller and smaller percentage of the active customer base in any particular period. As many Amazon.com observers have noted recently, not only revenue per new customer but revenue per existing customer has been declining for the past two years. Amazon?s goal is ultimately to gain greater ?wallet share? with each of its customers, by enticing them to buy many different kinds of products. At some point, therefore, the revenue-per-existing- customer trend will have to reverse itself (in our aggressive model, this happens in Q3, 2000; in our official model, it happens in Q1, 2001). To more easily assess the likelihood that the revenue-per-existing- customer trend will stop declining and begin increasing, it makes sense to analyze why it is declining in the first place. In our opinion, the best explanation stems from a comparison between the habits of the early-adopter customer and more mainstream customer. Two years ago, in Q2 1997, we estimate that the average Amazon existing customer bought $41 worth of stuff (books) in the quarter. A year later, the average purchase had fallen 21% to $32, and this year, it fell 21% again to $26. Over the same time period, Amazon?s base of existing customers grew from 340,000 to 8.4 million and its product categories increased to include books, music, videos, auctions, and gifts. We believe that the main reason revenue-per-existing-customer is falling despite the addition of additional product categories is that the customers added more recently simply buy less on average than the early adopters who discovered the company back in 1997. If this trend were to continue indefinitely, obviously, the company would be in trouble?each new customer would be worth less than the last, and the company would get stuck in the law of decreasing returns. As the more mainstream customers come to represent a greater and greater percentage of the total base, however, we believe that revenue-per-existing-customer should begin to stabilize (according to management, this is beginning to happen). The recent addition of Toys and Electronics to Amazon?s product offerings, as well as a reported stabilization in revenue-per-customer of recently added existing customers, should help stabilize and ultimately reverse Amazon.com?s overall revenue-per-customer trend. In Q3, for example, our aggressive projections call for revenue-per- customer to decline 18% year-over-year to $28 (slightly more than the 17% decline in Q2), and then decline only 7% in Q4 and 3% in Q1. As mentioned, our aggressive model, which calls for $3 billion in 2000 revenue, assumes that revenue-per-customer will begin to |