Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Berkshire Hathaway Class B -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dalroi who wrote (896)	8/6/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Benkea	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1652

From 1996, "I dwell on this rise in per-share book value because it roughly indicates our economic progress during the year." "In last year's letter, with Berkshire shares selling at $36000, I told you: (1) Berkshire's gain in market value in recent years had outstripped its gain in intrinsic value, even though the latter gain had been highly satisfactory; (2) that kind of overperformance could not continue indefinitely; (3) Charlie and I did not at that moment consider Berkshire to be undervalued. Since I set down those cautions, Berkshire's intrinsic value has increased very significantly - aided in a major way by a stunning performance at GEICO that I will tell you more about later - while the market price of our shares has changed little. This, of course, means that in 1996 Berkshire's stock underformed the business. Consequently, today's price/value relationship is both much different from what it was a year ago and, as Charlie and I see it, more appropriate." From 1997: "Gains in book value are, of course, not the bottom line at Berkshire. What truly counts are gains in per-share intrinsic value. Ordinarily, though, the two measures tend to move roughly in tandem, and in 1997 that was the case..." ($36,000 in 1996 X 34.1% book value increase in 1997 = $48,276) From 1998: "increased the per-share book value 48.3%" "Though Berkshire's intrinsic value grew very substantially in 1998, the gain fell well short of the 48.3% recorded for book value. Nevertheless, intrinsic value still far ("far" was italicized) exceeds book value. So there you have it folks, BRK is worth "very substantially" more than $48,276, but "well short" of $71,593 as of about March this year. This equates with $1609.20 to $2386.43 for the B's as of about March of this year (or whenever he writes these). B's are currently 27% above the "very substantial" level and 14% below the "well short" level. I think it is very same to assume that we can be comfortable here at these levels - especially on the B's as they are trading at a discount.