SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Father Terrence who wrote (49656)8/7/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
People who can't think, (ie. Hillary and Christine), are awed by anybody who claims to be a "scientist". Considering how most women don't understand why it rains or how they get pregnant it is no wonder that they are easily led by scientific quacks.



To: Father Terrence who wrote (49656)8/7/1999 2:16:00 PM
From: Michael M  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Bad science/no science. Same thing. Forgive me butting in but think James went to the bathroom or something.

Well, wait a darn minute -- for those who would want to define "bad" the picture changes.

"Science" not entirely keeping faith with scientific method is "no science". Tortuous experiments involving unwilling subjects might be real science but "bad" science, don't you think?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News