To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (328 ) 8/7/1999 4:33:00 PM From: scaram(o)uche Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1475
Transplantation 1999 Jul 15;68(1):83-6 Adverse effects of mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplant recipients with presumed chronic rejection. Butani L, Palmer J, Baluarte HJ, Polinsky MS Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19134, USA. BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to be superior to azathioprine in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in adult renal transplant recipients. Although MMF is also being widely used in pediatric transplant patients, data documenting its safety are limited. METHODS: A retrospective review of the transplant records at St. Christopher's Hospital for Children was conducted to identify patients who had received MMF. RESULTS: Twenty-four children were switched from azathioprine to MMF, 4.8+/-2.9 years after transplantation. After an additional 0.8+/-0.4 years, MMF had been discontinued in 13 patients (54%) because of adverse effects (AE). The only variable that predicted the development of AE was a lower calculated creatinine clearance at the time of initiation of MMF. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric renal transplant recipients with impaired renal function, the use of MMF at the recommended dose is associated with an unacceptably high incidence of AE; in such patients, the MMF dose may require modification for the level of renal function. Transplantation 1999 Jul 15;68(1):158-61 Disseminated varicella infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Rothwell WS, Gloor JM, Morgenstern BZ, Milliner DS Mayo Eugenio Litta Children's Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immune suppressive agent, effective in the prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of records of pediatric renal transplant recipients from 1985 to the present. RESULTS: Since October 1995, the immune suppression protocol for pediatric renal transplant recipients at Mayo Eugenio Litta Children's Hospital has included MMF, prednisone, and cyclosporine A. During that time, 19 children and adolescents have received renal allografts, 17 of whom were seropositive for varicella antibody before transplantation, while 2 were seronegative. Varicella infection occurred in 3 of 19 patients (15.8%), all 3 of whom had serologically documented immunity to varicella virus before transplantation. All episodes occurred within 12 months of transplantation. All had generalized vesicular lesions without dermatomal distribution. None of the patients developed fever, respiratory, mucocutaneous, or central nervous system manifestations. All were managed with oral acyclovir, and had an uncomplicated recovery without neuralgia. By contrast, of 74 consecutive patients transplanted before use of MMF, only 1 patient (1.4%) had varicella infection after transplantation (P=0.026). CONCLUSION: The enhanced immunosuppression achieved with MMF appears to be associated with increased susceptibility to varicella infection.