To: bearcub who wrote (7849 ) 8/8/1999 1:59:00 PM From: Lane3 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
Aw, come on, bearcub, take a pill. First you get me all buttered up and blushing over what appeared to be a compliment.FINALLY, someone can do something besides parrot and ridicule. now we're getting somewhere. Then you pick one itty bitty sentence--Some of the doomers seem, at times, a little to willing to go there. -- out of five paragraphs of philosophy on social contracts and jump all over me for being judgmental. That sentence couldn't possibly have been milder. It was qualified three, count 'em, three times with "some" doomers, "at times," and "a little to(o)." I didn't say anything about you personally. And I thought the term "doomers" was p.c. on this thread. I haven't used it much before. First I talked about "pollys" and "true believers," but that was misinterpreted. A little earlier today I used the term "prepareds." Seems to me "doomers" is more colorful and a more balanced counterpoint to "pollys," but if you don't like it, just tell me what to use. The thread needs some kind of shortcut to identify the two spectrum ends. Re the slippery slope "judgment," I never said a slippery slope was inevitable. I simply said there was a fear of one. I was merely trying to pose the issue for discussion. Re your last point, i doubt it. but then, maybe you'll reply and i'll find out, i judged you wrongly, and you really DO believe your judgement stuff. , I'm sorry, but I don't follow you. You're right, I don't fully appreciate what you and your family went through to come up with your collective approach to Y2K. I imagine that getting a whole extended family moving in lockstep is a bit like herding cats. In my part of the world, my family and loved ones are all adults, which means that they make their own decisions. If you want to talk philosophy with me, I'm up for it, but I'm interested in trading ideas, not insults. Karen