Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (49973)	8/8/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 108807

As I said, I have contributed from time to time to medical relief charities, and have no problem with inter- governmental or multilateral aid on things like immunizations and window screens...I am not an epidemiologist, and my only purpose was to note the controversy and uncertainty reported by a non- partisan organization....There is nothing peculiar about saying that I am including him as an expert in his field, not as someone with an opinion on the climatological aspects of the controversy. Nor is there anything peculiar in noting that I had pasted articles more immediately relevant to the modeling controversy before that...I have no views to speak of, since I am not a climatologist or epidemiologist. I am arrested enough by the surrounding controversy, and alarmed enough at the thought of severe restrictions on economic development, that I am loathe to see us commit ourselves to a highly restrictive regime of "greenhouse gas" controls. That is pretty much my "position".....