SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (13771)8/8/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: E. Davies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
When wage parity is reached there is trouble afoot
I claim no macro economic expertise at all, but I wonder if even this premise is true.

Does the world really need people in poverty to prosper economically? Would we rather not have people in India or the Phillipines earning wages that allows them to buy products that we produce?

If cheap labor disappeared wouldnt we just find a way to automate the production more? Sure it would cost more capital but then we could actually sell the shoes to the people of the Phillipines instead of just having them make them for us.

Has this not always been the path of history? Labor gets supplanted by machinery and the standard of living in the world as a whole improves.

Is economic prosperity really a zero-sum game where we can prosper only when others suffer?
Eric



To: ahhaha who wrote (13771)8/8/1999 7:30:00 PM
From: Nitrous  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
>>MACR has problems. They're trying but things are going away from them. The result is
top line can't be expected to be so robust as seemed the case. The shake out is upon all of them<<

What about the Spearman's rho regarding macromedia?
LOL,I am scaring myself :-)

Nitrous~~