To: Adam Nash who wrote (25855 ) 8/10/1999 12:38:00 PM From: rhet0ric Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213187
The last time I checked (which granted, might have been 12 months ago!) i thought the market research was that FrontPage had a significant majority marketshare. That wouldn't surprise me. Frontpage is given away with every copy of Windows, IE, and Office. But as I said, Frontpage is very much consumerware. The problem with WYSIWYG html editors is that they create non-standard html, and often screw up your documents. If they do let you into the html, their raw html editors are often very low-end. Dreamweaver is good because it's not only a very powerful WYSIWYG editor (it has built in multi-platform scripting support for Javascript, dhtml, flash, etc.), but as mentioned is integrated with powerful raw html editors. Anyway, this is relevant to the AAPL thread because I can't imagine that anyone would use a PC because of Frontpage unless they were an ASP shop, which probably means they were on PCs to start with. Higher-end development apps are a different matter: a lot of these are for NT or Solaris only (although some, e.g. StoryServer, are Java based, and others, e.g. Webobjects, obviously have Mac versions). This won't change until OS X comes out, and apps are ported from Linux or Solaris. Even still, most Internet teams work in a mixed environment, with designers/ site builders on Macs, developers on either NT or Unix, and business/ sales etc on Win98. I've worked at 4 Web shops in the last 4 years, and consulted for 20 others, and this seems to be the typical pattern. It'll be interesting to see what happens when OS X matures, and it becomes a very viable option to be entirely Mac-only. rhet0ric