SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (50283)8/9/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Respond to of 108807
 
>I presume you have read Brave New World. Once you have some entity -- let us say,
the state -- in the business of authorizing the number of offspring you may have, what's
to prevent it from deciding against letting you define its characteristics the way you
want? <

I have read it (long ago!) and you underscore one of the really thorny issues of being human.

We don't have a way to regulate fertility - one that isn't corruptible. I can't think of one with humans in the loop.

And yet we must have a way. Continued breeding without plan or limit should only be contenanced by those who are ready to embrace the fact that Man adapts, but people don't. The consequence WILL be population control through economic disaster.

I would rather risk Frankenstein than know Easter Island writ large.



To: jbe who wrote (50283)8/9/1999 2:37:00 PM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Frankenstein, in the story, was NOT a monster. The monster was society.



To: jbe who wrote (50283)8/9/1999 2:40:00 PM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
In Brave New World it was not the technology that was at fault, but the way in which a coercive State employed the technology against the interests of individuals. In a way it mirrored Orwell's 1984.