Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (27392)	8/10/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

You're like the guy at the dance with the booger on his moustache. Nobody will tell you what a nimrod you are because you're too rude to pay attention and too ignorant to care. FY revenue growth of 48%. You are not paying attention to The World Around You. It's different than the one inside your rum spongecake brain. I gave you the bottom at 1:01 p.m. today. Your paper trade Puts are going to expire worthless, chump. pazuzu.simplenet.com

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (27392)	8/10/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77400

Hmmmm... Well, you know I can't help but laugh. You did it to yourself this time Mizzou. First you have these mysterious 105's that TLC has made clear don't exist. Second you said over and over that Cisco would miss revenues - WRONG! They smooshed them while beating by a penny. Cisco continues to dominate their markets. Third, and this is the very thing I've been waiting for (please pass this one to BR)...a large service provider network using Lu/Asnd equipment had serious outages (see the story on MCI). As I pointed out when T had their outages that every network will fail at some point and that it was merely a matter of time before a Lu/Asnd customer had an outage as well. The issue then becomes how does the company responsible for the outage deal with the situation. As Justin pointed out Cisco charted a jet a flew out new equipment immediately...I hope LU does the same or at least offers to correct this situation rather than deny as Mory would do. In the end I hope that this puts to rest the bickering I hear from you and BR about the T outage. So much for BR's position that there redundancy built into LU's products will keep thier networks from failing. Everything fails... at some point.... Even jets fall out of the air... sometimes. There is no such thing as 100% up time. Everyone strives for 5 9's.... leaving a .001% chance of a failure.... Looks like LU's got one here. Well., with Cisco up $2 1/4 in after market this is shaping up to be one heck of good day. :) I really do wish you had those 105's. ::::)))) OG

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (27392)	8/10/1999 6:47:00 PM
From: TechTrader42	Respond to of 77400

Sorry, Mizzou, but it was at 60 1/2 at 5:15. And 10,000 shares at 60 3/8 a couple of minutes before that. It traded as high as 60 7/8. Those puts don't look good for the morning. Looks like it's going to gap up. Brooke

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (27392)	8/10/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: bgg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Mighty Mizzou = foolish idiot face it -- you've been spouting off for weeks about how CSCO's quarter would tank, that REVENUE growth would be underwhelming, and that we were looking at low $50s. Again, you were wrong. Wrong wrong wrong! (BTW - I know I'll hear it from other folks on this thread who don't want people to respond to "thread morons", but I say screw it, and screw anyone on this thread who tells me not respond to idiots like MM. This time, the material is too ripe). MM- I know you'll never admit it, and on CSCO's first down day after this announcement you'll be saying see-I-told-you-so, but you have proven again that your opinions and beliefs about CSCO as a company, an investment, etc, are WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG! You should have bought CSCO when it hit $56 today, if you had any sense of this sector. I'll wait to hear from you again in a few weeks as you continue to spout off about CSCO's lousy products ($3.55 billion in revenue, 12%+ q/q growth), inferior service provider offerings (MCI blowup = LU), etc., etc. You are boring, and don't know jack sh_t about the networking industry and how its players will do on the Street.