Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark_H who wrote (23613)	8/10/1999 7:50:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

It is best to include what Pugs was replying to... To: Pugs who wrote (47932) From: Riley G Friday, Jun 12 1998 11:04AM ET Reply # of 54773 Pugs, Did you get a telephone call like I did from the SEC? In mine they wanted the real names of the NAYS on SI, and I gave them what I had in regards to those on RMIL and TVSI and also the STALKERS. I think that some of them are about to have an hard punch in the face! I think the SEC is investigating the complaints of alleged Market Marker's (M.M.'s) and Admitted Short Sellers Shills (A.S.S.'s) here on SI and other boards. And also the SEC was very interested in which MM's that I suspected of the illegal activity, and I believe that they have uncovered something to make them dig further into the M.M.'s and A.S.S.'s. Feel the Power, Riley G PS. They have TONTO, Ditchdigger, S Martin, M Kugler, Ron Reece, Tideglider, and a few other suspects to look into now! Message #23613 from Mark_H at Aug 10 1999 7:31PM Pugs and the SEC advocate are old acquaintances: Message 4835953

To: Mark_H who wrote (23613)	8/10/1999 7:56:00 PM
From: zonkie	Respond to of 26163

I think this is proof that "boxerguy" is sending proof of other things to other entities in the District of Columbia. urbanlegends.miningco.com

To: Mark_H who wrote (23613)	8/10/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: Tom C	Respond to of 26163

So the SEC hammer dropped on RMIL about 6 months after they (R+G and Pugs) shared what they knew with the SEC Advocate. I wonder if Pugs is talking with the same SEC Advocate now? If I were not so concerned about being sued I'd suggest a pool, we could call it the "Hammer Time" pool. Tom The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "Safe Harbor" for forward-looking statements. It is not applicable in the above instance, but really does looks cool when appended in italics to my post, thanks Jeff and Kevin. Certain of the statements contained herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements with respect to events, the occurrence of which involve risks, uncertainties, blind faith, and the quality and quantity of the liquor served at the Robbie Stephens conference. These forward-looking statements may be impacted, either positively or negatively, by things taht may happen in the future. The above post is not suggesting that anyone actually bet or jump into the pool. Nor is it suggesting that a pool actually exists or should exist. Information concerning potential factors that could not affect the future of the internet is from time to time discussed in posts such as this one.