SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (68406)8/11/1999 12:29:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578934
 
Elmer Re <<What's so "foolish" about ohm's law? Maybe you should be asking how AMD can claim only 50W when the numbers seem to prove otherwise.>>

I assume you are not being sarcastic in your question,

First of all ohm's law is V=IR, not the one Paul used.

Second, Maximum power dissipation of any IC, is not determined by multiplying core Voltage by peak current. IC does not behave like a simple circuit.

Mani



To: Elmer who wrote (68406)8/11/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578934
 
elmer,

Re:" What's so "foolish" about ohm's law? Maybe you should be asking how AMD can claim only 50W when the numbers seem to prove otherwise."

Yeah you are right again elmer:

AMD's lying about the power.
AMD's lying about their spec numbers.
AMD's lying about the voltage.
AMD's lying about the clock speeds.

You sir have a 100% history of being a complete idiot wrt to the facts. You cast FUD on everything and then blithely move on to the next item.

Kash



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News