SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Susan G who wrote (11097)8/11/1999 3:57:00 AM
From: Crystal ball  Respond to of 28311
 
GNET never hit 45 (90). Support. Correction ends at bottom after 2pm Beige Book Wed 08/11/1999. Greenspan can not hurt Europe's Central Banks, so forget about the 6.23% US Treas 30 Year Bond and 5.5% Fed rate, the correction is now over, watch the Beige Book, and the Dollar to EURO and YEN!
I am,
Truly yours,
-Crystal ball



To: Susan G who wrote (11097)8/11/1999 8:31:00 AM
From: eDollar.com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
when you invest and play with stocks (like day trade, position trade), never take anything said by publications and analysts as having more than 90% weightage to your decision to buy and sell. If you follow them religiously, you will loose money or loose profits.

I wonder where are those analysts hiding whoo called AOL to be 200$ stock. YHOO 250$ stock.

What went wrong?

I think GNET can potentially double but not because breifing says so or doenst say so.



To: Susan G who wrote (11097)8/11/1999 12:43:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
Briefing.com concerned that ho-hum earnings report out of Cisco

I thought the reaction to cisco's numbers might be a yawn, however I dug up some prior quarter results last night and the revenues do indeed look strong... this is the 2nd weakest qtr historically. Plus they manage earnings so you never get more than 1½ over the zacks numbers.

Ah well maybe I can finally get some juniper in here (which I missed)