Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krowbar who wrote (50581)	8/11/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

That doesn't matter, and of course his prior behavior was an issue in the case- you could argue it should have been tried after he left office- but once under oath he could not lie. It is not our job to pick, in court, what we will choose to tell the truth about. That would bring down our system of justice. I think that is clear. I would never be an apologist for a liar. I revile Oliver North and Bill Clinton equally- you cannot lie under oath, no matter what your purpose.

To: Krowbar who wrote (50581)	8/11/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: Father Terrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Who cares about oaths? Clinton should never have been president.