SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (68458)8/11/1999 2:30:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577989
 
Elmer Re <<You already admitted you weren't sure and now you're an expert! >>

I was not sure how it is determined by manufacturers like AMD or Intel. But for a complex IC it is not simply by multiplying the peak current by core voltage. DO YOU ACTUALLY DISPUTE THIS???? I think it is done experimentally while running the CPU. Max is when CPU is going fully such as when solving an FEA problem.

If you do dispute this go and look at Intels specs. Or look it up in a book. I can recommand few good ones. You will see that you are wrong.

Elmer, you would have totally saved your face if you had just admitted your mistake and had moved on.

Mani



To: Elmer who wrote (68458)8/11/1999 2:53:00 AM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577989
 
Elmer,

I usually don't bother replying to your posts on the following principle:

If your opponent is making a fool of himself then move out of the way.

But now that you are embarrassing my former employer I must defend Intel's honor. I thought that your day job is EE. Now I am starting to think that you may be a custodian, a conference room scheduler or a security guard. How else can one explain your unshaken belief that a 1.6 V CPU with a peak current of 42 amperes must dissipate 67.2 watts (1.6 * 42 = 67.2).

Can you point to any data sheet where the Elmer/Engel law of max power dissipation holds?

Kap