Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Dior who wrote (14055)	8/11/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

You can't succeed with these silly odds worsening word games like support and resistance. They're a posteriori and have NO consequence for price except to the extent that other patzers believe in them. A pro senses and uses the degree of belief in them as a means to accumulate a reverse position. SI is a great source of this sense. My bottoms correlate around resistance points. This sentence is incoherent. As the stock breaks through each resistance point, the bottom changes in retrospect. This sentence is incorrect, incoherent, and indicative of a brain filled with myths. I have traded this stock more times than you have posted on this thread, and make money on it consistently. This is a fact whether you like it or not, "reality check"! You seem to forget I proved that you were a liar. Why is this so difficult for you to accept? Because we don't know if you're lying again. There are actually some on here that trade this and or other stocks and make a profit. Sounds like this accountant hawking his services on SI who claimed he had "happy executives day trading for profit and making a killing". After I worked him over he decided to close up shop. He was making statements that could get his license revoked. That's unlikely because the great government protectorate isn't operating these days. It will once enough of the public has been sufficiently burned by its own greed through trading. So why is your method better than others? The stock is worth what I said it was because the assumptions of valuations are still intact. Patzers like you through their stupidity and fear have driven it down to a discount. Nothing surprising about that. Shall I bring out your posts from the past? You made bullish forecasts all the way down. What good is it to do that? It only hurts your own wild gambling. Are you hearing me? You have nothing to say. You're just a gambler who happens to reside where there is volatility. Listening would have been very expensive.