Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50652)	8/11/1999 2:11:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

>I also gave E a foot massage. Sensual, certainly. At least I hope (!). But implying an intimate act? Come on, now. Haven't you ever had a backrub or foot massage that didn't end up in doing IT? (If not, I pity you.)< I think the difference is Penni and I don't need other people to watch. Or want other people to watch. And we don't want to watch.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50652)	8/11/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

AH---you are such a lawyer!!!! Twist twist twist OK, Christopher, you win-I'm the one with the dirty mind. YOU certainly weren't insinuating those things. LOoking toward the hills was a biblical allusion. I see...what a nasty mind I have!!!!! ANd also oh yes--I do have the maturity level of an adolescent, because I didn't enjoy watching what you were doing and any normal adult shouldn't have objected to this perfectly innocent activity "well within the boundaries of contemporary social taste". And how awful- you guessed my secret. I read only Dr. Seuss, and even he sometimes upsets me--don't you wonder about that Grinch and what really went on between him and Little Suzi Who? And my God-- I almost walked out of Pocohontas. Turning her into a sex-starved Barbie Doll like that. I must fight this evil where I see it!!! But you have exposed me; I shall depart. I leave you to your laving.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50652)	8/11/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Chris, I don't think it's necessary to get on the offensive here. You and I did not mean to cause anyone a qualm. I think that people should accept this and let the subject move on to broader questions of taste and context, which could prove far more interesting and less personal than arguing about whether your postings to me were out of bounds. I'd rather talk about what is in and out of bounds on various threads, wouldn't you? Is it a function of the subject of the threads or the participants or some curious amalgam?