SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Go2Net Long List of Go2Netrillionaires (GNET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (484)8/11/1999 6:14:00 PM
From: bbritts  Respond to of 4201
 
I have been using MetaCrawler for a couple years now. In March of this year I sold my Texaco and Marathon oil stocks because I didn't like the 35% they had increased over the last 5 years. With this extra cash to invest, I started researching some possibilities. In April (the 12th) I bought GNET, DELL, and CSCO. I had been using the Motley Fool message boards quite a bit. From those boards I learned of the existence of SI. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
bbritts #66
(Barb)



To: Carolyn who wrote (484)8/11/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: Joana Tides  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4201
 
I first saw Go2net Portal in early/mid '98 and liked it. Liked reading Silicon Investor (hadn't joined yet) and GNET owning it was more good news. Thought the Metacrawler Search was dynamite and that thing has made me some money in stocks...add that to Dogpile now and There's Your Powerhouse!! Anyway, I'd made net friends with BlueSnowshoe and he was talking about the new GNET stock and the ups and downs of it, so I bought some, made some money on it, sold it, then bought back a little more again when it went down. Then in late '98 when GNET started to POP from the mid-30's, I "cleaned out the doghouse" to buy a nice block (All Thanks to Blue for pulling my coat about it both times and the DD revealed the hidden jewels)... and also bought a few shares for my daughter. Then Whooooooooo! GNET Bottlerocketed, Split, Went Up Again, Split, Went Up Again....in that Great Winter Internet Rally of '98-99 - bought it, sold it, bought it, sold it, bought it...playing ups and downs, always holding onto some shares. I've managed to get a nice amount of shares freeriding now and have money aside to buy my daughter her first car when she starts driving soon.... it'll be a safe and solid Ford Taurus for her too, thanks to GNET. She said she wants a VW Bug or a Mustang or a Mirage... but when I said "It's either A Taurus or I'm tying tires to the bumpers and painting it schoolbus yellow like Tony Danza did on tv to his daughters first car" so then she said she'd love a Taurus LOL. Maybe there'll even be enough left over for her to get a weird paint job for it so it doesn't look so stodgy hey you never know.
Looking Forward To GNET Do It Again, & thinking that's not a pipe dream but quite a Reasonable Expectation !! GNET's got a highly centered business plan, top-flight executives, it's debt free and it's got the backing of Paul Allen's Wired World to take it to The Next Level of Synergy and that's another plus for it. The Economy's doing good.
A Real Netrillionaire? Not Yet But Keeping My Fingers Crossed...
Best Luck To All,
Joana



To: Carolyn who wrote (484)8/11/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: White Shoes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4201
 
STORY: THE LIFE AND DEATH OF STEVEN SAGE

Unfortunately, my memory isn't that good. For a good resource, people might want to check out Josef Svejk's History of Silicon Investor thread. I know I have spelled his name wrong.

The weirdest thing I can remember on Silicon Investor was Steven Sage's Short Term Trades thread.

Sage started a thread with a plan to trade $50,000 in real money and report his trading on the thread. He said it was a small inheritance or something; I believe he was in his mid 20's. He was into a couple of sub-sectors of tech stocks in particular. He made some good calls and some bad calls. When things were really down, he got really sad and moody. People began helping him keep track, offering picks, cheering him on, etc. He developed a healthy following. I stumbled on him because he frequently made the hot subjects list.

When his money ran really short, he made a huge bet (something you would never do) on something he'd already lost money on. It bounced a bit, so he got back to par. But before long, he was losing money hand over fist again...people started badmouthing him. Most of the thread jumped all over the critics. It got nasty.

One day, Sage announced that he had "made the necessary arrangements to access the remainder of the trust fund", and was going to redouble his efforts and begin trading with $250,000 in fresh money. He started pissing this away too, gradually. The critics slunk away when he enjoyed periods of success.

Then someone got real aggressive, asking for Sage to prove his trades. Sage had become sloppy, reporting large buys of stock at times that had low volumes - it was easy to verify that he had not bought at that time. OK - one or two mistakes - Sage managed to hold things together and convince everyone that he was on the up and up - though a week or two of "fax me your confirmations!!!!" bickering dominated the thread.

Again, the Sage defenders began hounding the critics. I was one of Sage's early critics, mildly suggesting that his stock picks were poor and that his averaging-down strategy made no sense, especially in the companies he was investing in. Sure, lose $5,000 that way, but if you have an inheritance, spread some of it around conservatively. Sage had been all over me like a cheap suit for that unwelcome advice.

There were more layers to this than any of us had known. Sage was playing some of Sage's critics, as well as some other abusive or strange characters on other threads. He altered his typing style and punctuation, sometimes pretending to be a woman. He had a couple of signatures though - one was that his idea of what constituted tech investing (certain sorts of telecommunications hardware companies) tended to give him away. Anyway, it was all part of an elaborate game of multiple personalities, more elaborate than anyone could understand. This was one deranged character.

Shortly after the "fax me your confirmations!!!" arguments, Sage made a few final ludicrous bets, and lost them, and his house of cards came tumbling down. He was forced to admit that he was a fraud. What's more, he didn't really defraud anyone, but spent a long time making up stories, which made him a pathetic fraud.

Game to the end, he decided to milk his "confession phase" for all it was worth. There were layers even to his confessions, and "Sage" re-emerged later, in "waves".

Peeling back as many layers of the Sage onion as possible, one thing seemed clear. "Sage" wasn't for real. The "real" Sage might have been learning to invest about a year previous to this, starting out with $5,000 or $20,000 and losing it all - and he became increasingly depressed, lonely, and addicted to the net. Then again, this was one of Sage's several 'true confessions', so it may not be true.

Oddly, some of the folks who had begun discussing short-term trading on Sage's thread, and using spreadsheets to track three or four portfolios (mostly 'real money' as I recall), just moved all the talk off to a new thread. It was as if the fact that Sage never really existed hadn't made a dent. He went away without so much as a pause for breath, or a short eulogy.

No one ever apologized for flaming Sage's critics, or felt embarrassed for rushing to his defence. Then again, some of those people were Sage.

Our communities, be they towns, cities, or virtual 'families' always have a dark side, it seems.

END OF STORY

PS Thanks for making me #77 on the GNET 'list'. Cool number.

PPS I am not Sage! I am real! I will even fax you my confirmations, if and when I trade. Any portfolios I have posted online have been deliberately set up as 'model fake portfolios'.