Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50726)	8/11/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

There are so few people who I can be nasty to. E thought I was being nasty only to you. But I have been nasty before and I will be nasty again- and here, let me state, that I use nasty in the sense of "mean" or "unpleasant" as opposed to its possible sexual meaning. Now, remember when we were talking about causes? I am not nasty to cause you to love it, and my purpose is not to arouse your lust (clearly this is easily done), I am nasty because I feel like being nasty. If it causes lust in you it is an unintended and unusual cause. It is, I think, unreasonable, for you to feel lust in the face contempt. I do not believe the "reasonable man" is turned on by such things. Therefore I have to tell you that your lust is your own problem and my arousing it totally unintentional and I am in no way craving or begging for more.