Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator from New York? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chalu2 who wrote (927)	8/11/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: Catfish	Respond to of 3389

Neal Boortz has written an essay on EO 13083. Here is the link: boortz.com

To: chalu2 who wrote (927)	8/11/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: nuke44	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3389

The response from Mr. Youngblood contained a link to Neal Boortz's essay on E.O. 13083. It is definitive and to the point, so I won't reiterate what Mr. Boortz had to say in regards to E. O. 13083. As far as E.O. 13312 being the new version, I'm not sure. The number may not yet have been assigned, but the new E.O., negating the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights like it's predecessor, 13083, is due to go into effect 4 Nov. 99, unless Congress once again shoots it down due to pressure from the states and from their constituents. Since the Democrats lost control of Congress, Clinton has increasingly sought to use the Executive Order process to do an end run on Constitutional government, by using Executive Orders to create a more powerful Executive branch, while negating the powers of the states, and of the individual to do other than what they are told by the federal government. 13083 and it's successor are the most audacious and all encompassing of these E.O.'s. In the words of Clinton advisor Paul Begala, "Executive Orders. Stroke of a pen, law of the land. Is that cool or what?" Begala and his boss can go fuck themselves.