To: Bill Jackson who wrote (68577 ) 8/11/1999 8:21:00 PM From: Petz Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578930
Bill, re:peak power, etc. Power supply design current is 42 amps = 67.2 watts Athlon 650 maximum thermal dissipation 54 watts A "discrepancy" of 13.2 watts = 24% of thermal dissipation For the K6-2-400 CXT core, I found the following specifications: K6-2-400 maximum thermal dissipation = 22.7 watts K6-2-400 maximum DC current 11.25A@2.2v+0.62A@3.3v = 26.8 watts A "discrepancy" of 18% Let me explain the K6-2 18% discrepancy first. The spec clearly states that the 11.25A maximum current for the 2.2 volt supply (Vcc) only occurs if the Vcc is jacked up to 2.3 volts! Allowing for this, the current draw at 2.2 volts would only be 10.76A. The discrepancy just shrunk to 3 watts or 13%. This amount is explainable for very short term peak current demands (much less than one millisecond) which occur occasionally but average out to zero. (There are also valleys.) For proof of this fact (Paul, are you listening?) notice that the Athlon spec specifies a "rate of change" for current draw of 30 AMPS per microsecond! Also from the very first paragraph of the VR design note:"Due to the large number of transistors that can switch simultaneously, power supply designs must meet large transient power requirements." A small amount of the 13% discrepancy is also explained by the fact that the CPU is connected to the chipset and other loads which draw and dissipate power from the bus. Now, what about the 24% Athlon "discrepancy?" Why is it 6% more than the K6-2's? Simply because of the statement from the power supply design note, to wit, "These projected values allow designers to support future processors on the same motherboard, thereby allowing upgradeability.." In fact, from this we can estimate that a 0.25æ processor, about 6% faster than 650 MHz , is just around the corner. (If it weren't just around the corner, it would be on 0.18æ!) 700 MHz, anyone?