Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (11176)	8/12/1999 1:18:00 PM
From: Ptaskmaster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard, "Then what's the point of the threads?" is exactly the point. We are all here to share ideas and information, save some time and effort, and facilitate due diligence so we can make informed investment and trading decisions. I've probably missed something here, but am still searching for information. The following is not directed at you, but to the thread in general: _____________________ Was there ever any independent verification of the spectacularly high Oro Grande pgm assay values provided by Michael P. Thomas (Jan 1988) of the M.H.S. Laboratory, operated as a subsidiary of Mullen High School, in Denver, Colorado? The independent P. Fischer report for Inco (Jan 1991) gave Inco pgm assay results no better than 2 ppm Pt, much less for Pd, and traces of Rhodium for Oro Grande. It gave similar results for the single Weaver Creek sample analyzed by Inco. Was there independent confirmation of any higher pgm values from in situ, native, unconcentrated rocks? Ptask