SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken Benes who wrote (38878)8/12/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116894
 
<<As far as the juniors go, unless you have a lot of money to put at risk, I would be very careful. >>

Au contraire, if you have little money.. your best pick would be a solid junior who will be the next producer. You must look with the one with cash, no debt, ideally a senior partner and of course a large gold deposit that has the earmark of a future profitable mine once gold move back above $3.00.

With this kind of selection, you can invest for the long term and be patient.

The big risk is a prolonged trip below $250. Something that could last a few years... then many of the big mines you are talking about and that are not hedged enough..will go down. Not so with the juniors with no debt that are preparing for the next bull.

The key in todays environment is not the size of the miner, but its balance sheet and its ability to sustain lower metal prices.



To: Ken Benes who wrote (38878)8/12/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: baystock  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116894
 
<<For the average investor, stay with the big names, and do not become a long term investor in gold. Making money in the gold market requires some very adroit trading abilities.
>>

We are in complete agreement on the Vancouver hucksters. Yes they and their cronies are merely lying dormant until the next up cycle starts at which point they will come out in full force to resume their parasitic ways.