Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (27590)	8/12/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

>>I'm taking my family up to our "Vacation house that Cisco built" for the weekend in the San Juan Islands. I've been hearing a lot about those islands lately. One of my brothers rented a cottage on one for the middle of August and another brother's receptionist used to live there. Is it true you buy land by the square foot? From whom (a land trust?) and how dear ($/sq ft)? I hear the Alaskan water is brutally cold. I guess your brother and father missed out on buying "Cisco built" homes. Have a good time. btw, August 12, 1999 7:24am THE DAY AHEAD: Debunking the Lucent vs. Cisco war By Larry DignanTDAIN ZDII Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU) and Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) gave Wall Street a lot to watch this week in their so-called networking war. But how much of a fight is this? Once you peel away the jazzy headlines it appears that Cisco and Lucent are headed toward a comfortable duopoly. And investors in either company (comparison chart zdii.com will be sitting pretty in five to 10 years. Lucent vs. Cisco: Happy duopoly? But first look at the moves that led to the flashy headlines. On Monday, Cisco announced a $1 billion investment in accounting firm KPMG's Internet consulting arm. The deal gives Cisco an army of integrators and consultants. On Tuesday, Lucent (financials) paid $3.7 billion for International Network Services hours before Cisco reported another stellar quarter. The INS purchase gives Lucent a services and integration boost as it encroaches on Cisco's data networking turf. So what's the big deal? Cisco owns about 7 percent of INS. But Cisco (financialshttp://www.zdii.com/financials.asp?ticker=csco) was reportedly talking to buy INS earlier in the year, but ended the discussion because it didn't want to enter the network integration business. Cisco is fat and happy making the hardware. The solution for Cisco was to have ties to an integrator by investing in KPMG but avoid the headaches of owning a services firm directly. Lucent is a different bird. "Lucent does a lot of integration work so the INS acquisition makes sense," said Michael Cristinziano, an analyst at Gerard Klauer Mattison. "For Cisco INS could have been a drag." Scrap the war metaphors. The bottom line is this: The INS deal is good for Lucent, but doesn't necessarily hurt Cisco. The companies have two different approaches -- Cisco will partner for services and Lucent will buy services. And for all the talk about the data and telecommunications collision, Cisco and Lucent have managed to stay out of each other's way for now. During its fourth quarter conference call, Cisco cited key telecommunications contract wins. Lucent cited data contract wins in its latest earnings. However, Cisco is still known for its IP-based networking gear and Lucent is known for its optical, wireless, and voice equipment. Networks are also becoming a multi-vendor affair and Lucent and Cisco will often share customers and have equipment that fits together. The end game? There isn't one. The networking market, growing at 30 percent to 50 percent, is large enough to support both players. Don't be surprised if Cisco and Lucent split the telco/networking market 35-35. We'll leave the other 30 percent to companies such as Nortel Networks (NYSE: NT). "I tell investors all the time to not worry about the battle between Lucent and Cisco," said Cristinziano. "In five to 10 years both will be number one and two. The only question is which one will be number one and which one will number two." zdii.com