To: Linkdog who wrote (15039 ) 8/12/1999 3:30:00 PM From: Sector Investor Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42804
A few points from that article to highlight: 1) Corporations mostly use Ethernet - therefore a straight FE/GE Ethernet connection at the ISP would be desirable. Aranea offers it, other Terabit vendors don't. 2) Traditionally, a core network overhaul would provide a carrier with three to five years of extra capacity, depending on network growth. However, that is not the case with the Internet. "The Internet is blowing away Moore's Law, which says companies can assimilate new technology every 12 to 18 months,' explains Andrew Greenfield, product manager for optical internetworking at Cisco. "With the Internet, consumption is doubling every three to six months.' 3) "Problems in the core can impact everything that their network touches, so carriers desire to make as few changes there as possible,'" 4) Even though CW is not mentioned, this applies to Aranea: "These routers were designed to scale from gigabit to multiple terabit speeds through software changes and new interfaces, rather than through the deployment of a new switch. Such system designs would make it simpler for ISPs to keep pace with rapid core bandwidth increases." 5) Aranea meets this need: "To convince carriers to purchase their products, suppliers will need to deliver products with more throughput. Reliability is another issue. Carriers want better self-healing features and more fault tolerance in the high-end routers. 6) Aranea schedule fits the need: "The new routers will help carriers keep pace with-maybe even get a bit ahead of-growing bandwidth demands. More bandwidth means enterprises may be able to deploy high-bandwidth apps at better prices. So, if router vendors deliver on their promises, carriers should build that terabit safety net sometime next year."