Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (50916)	8/12/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

You charmer you. peep peep

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (50916)	8/12/1999 7:45:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

On the contrary, I HAVE met the right chick. I married her.

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (50916)	8/13/1999 2:37:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 108807

Gee, Jim my pet, remind me to quote this bit of wisdom to your wife next time she and I have lunch.

To: James R. Barrett who wrote (50916)	8/13/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Father Terrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

James, have you ever considered how abnormal it is for a man to get married and stay with one woman for a lifetime? I mean, it is a very artificial situation. It is irrational, actually, and not even civilized. Multiple wives, concubines, mistresses and "test wives" make very good sense! You know, I have often wondered what happens to a man who comes to the U.S. from another culture and has, say, five wives? Does the government make him divorce four of them? If they do, why? It is violating his privacy and liberty. As a matter of fact, what right does the State have in telling any man that he can't have multiple wives, or any woman that she cannot have multiple husbands? [I think I just found a new cause!]