Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krowbar who wrote (50949)	8/12/1999 7:58:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

He had already dealt with many of these "problems" in Arkansas- indiscretions he committed as an "adult" male- I know, I know he wasn't to blame- it was all that child abuse. But nevertheless, there is quite a difference between Bill and Bush (although Bill certainly likes bush- just not that kind). Anyway, the way I see it Bill could have said- when asked about pot- it is none of your business, but no- he had to lie. I am guessing most politicians would say- no comment, none of your business. And when asked about his military service, could he give a straight answer? NO. It is his lying, not his actions that get him into trouble. AS long as Bush gives a straight answer the first time I don't see what you want people to dig into. Unless you just want to punish Bush because Clinton is such an asshole. You really ought to be angry at Clinton. There are some very decent Democrats- he jsut doesn't happen to be one of them.