Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CGarcia who wrote (14372)	8/13/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Boris Reynov	Respond to of 29970

This article sounds like being paid by AOL. Actually, it adds nothing to the already known facts. At the same time it fuels an uncertainty surrounding the issue. And, as we can see, damage is done. At least for today.

To: CGarcia who wrote (14372)	8/13/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: Jing Qian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

The valuable information from the MSNBC article is that Armstrong agrees with Tom Jermoluk's vision but Hindery is the trouble maker. Armstrong came from a DirecTV background . He was the founding father of the DirecTV project and look at how successful it is. It's natural that Armstrong will side with TJ to make E@H another success story. Otherwise, how can you explain that Armstrong approved the purchase of Excite in January? At that time, Hindery was not on board. The disagreement may be more between Armstrong and Hindery. But I think TJ can persaude Armstrong to avoid make another mistake similar to that of Netcapes.