SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Gene therapy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SnowShredder who wrote (126)8/13/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 319
 
AAV--"site specific integration
(if they can get it to work efficiently"

In the recent Ariad-Genovo paper it was
said that there was no reduction in hGH
peak levels after each administration of the
promoter--for more than ten months. Plus
they said they could precisely control
the circulating levels of hGH by controlling
the rapamycin dose...and if they don't give
the drug, hormone levels are undetectable.

Is that efficient--or was your question
something about directing the therapy to
a given site and not having it bleed all
through the system? I just assumed you shoot
the stuff into a big muscle and most of it
stays there. I guess I should go through
the papers and keyword search for 'liver'?

These were immunocompetent mice that did so
well--I assume they're still boppin around
with hGH spiked at will. My wife made me
sell most of her ARIA when I explained they
were working with monkeys, er, non-human
primates seems to be the code so the animal
rights folks don't perk up...but she let me
buy her shares back when it was mice in the
latest paper. Funny how nobody seems to be
impressed with mice--it's not like they're
growing unrealistic tumors on their backs,
geeze!



To: SnowShredder who wrote (126)8/13/1999 6:47:00 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 319
 
p.s. I was also under the impression that
the promoter and the gene were being delivered
seperately, but I may be messed up on my jargon
alltogether--three pieces right, the gene, the
activation domain (promoter, which is inserted
at a different time) and the dimerizer drug.

Honesty, the Materials and Methods section
of PNAS pp8657 goes right over my head. In fact
the only things I recognized were FKBP12
and NF-kB (well I know easy terms, cDNA, CMV,
BALB/c) but the rest of it is Greek to me.

Say, speaking of the Greeks, is Ariad named for
Ariadne? I posted some nonsense over on Yahoo to
try and draw somebody out on that, but never got
a reply. Anyone?



To: SnowShredder who wrote (126)8/14/1999 12:55:00 AM
From: Jongmans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 319
 
Cell Genesys has lentiviral vector +..

cellgenesys.com

Martin



To: SnowShredder who wrote (126)11/12/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 319
 
Where'd and gang: I really need to get a
copy of the recent Avigen PNAS paper and get
caught up on that one...it must be the only
stock in my Gene Therapy watch lists that is
consistently moving upward, geeze this momentum
guys are bold...or maybe they've all read the
paper and liked it (somehow I do not think
that all the Yahoos subscribe to PNAS)

Melissa Burton, Hiroyuki Nakai, Peter Colosi, Janet Cunningham, Rachel Mitchell, and Linda Couto. Coexpression of factor VIII heavy and light chain adeno-associated viral vectors produces biologically active protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1999; 96(22):12725-12730.

But for now maybe you can help. As I understand
it, contaminating wild type AAV triggers immune
response and limits transgene expression and
finding the best AAV play is finding the company
which can manufacture the purest? What about
recombination with wild-type after administration,
*all* AAV is supposed to be disabled, tricky.

Do you suppose the Avigen Hemophilia Canine model is
immune privledged in some way?

It is not at all likely I'll jump on to Avigen for
the conclusion of this momo ride, but I can't ignore
this stock either...clearly the market likes it, and
sometimes the market is right...even if for the wrong
reason. I saw a post which said that PBS may be running
a show with something about Gene Therapy, if I find the
name and time, I'll post.

Finally, Wilson apparently spoke at the NatureBiotech
Gene Therapy meeting on Monday--regarding EPO. I wonder
if he gave an update on the Upenn (Ariad?) EPO monkeys?
Any lukers oout there know? Also Carter of TGEN spoke on
Tuesday--anybody see that presentation--it should have
been about tgen's aav-CF in sinusitis model.

I do not know if Avigen had anybody presenting at
the meeting, sorry. I'd hoped to see a pulse in
Ariad and TGEN this past week on that meeting, TGEN
did do a PR, market yawned. I never expect any PR
from Ariad or Genovo...last time I checked in August
the two were still cooperating.

Finally, I sure hope I am not missing out on
some great gene therapy discussion over on the
listserve, if so please PM me.