To: Frederic Conrad who wrote (356 ) 8/14/1999 5:45:00 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Respond to of 542
Frederic, THANK YOU SO MUCH.... Re: ...however, I have serious reservations about the same being true with truedog or MNI. They strike me as pathetic weaklings who cower behind a computer monitor. I'm sure you hit the nail on the head about these two 'weaklings' but don't expect them to shoot the breeze with you --they're interested in ME, not you! Ahaha! I suspect their agenda is, somehow, to psych me out.... Why? Anyway, I take it good-humouredly --as a little game. You and Charles Hennessey are the only two sane, truly and genuinely open-to-discussion guys on this thread, but don't be naive about Ms Colleen: I suspect she's hooked up to the aforementioned finaglers. Just look at the way she's lamenting about 'personal attacks' --but who started them in the first place?? She allegedly launched this thread dedicated to JFK Jr, Is this an assassination? , right?? Now, browse through all her past messages on this thread: can you pick me one where she's addressing the subject? Don't even sweat it.... Actually, MNI, truedog, and more recently Ms C Kahn are more interested in messing with me than in anything else, according to some specific division of labor though: truedog's job is to sordidly trash me as a despicable Nazi-Hitlerian-anti-Semite jerk! And, believe me, he'll stick at it whatever obverse I may pledge. C Kahn has a more subtle assignment: although she introduced herself as a harmless, all-American housewife, she shoddily shifted the rap away from JFK Jr to that cursed ringer-skunk-at-the-garden-party, aka Gustave Jaeger. Hence, instead of addressing my so-called 'wild theories' about the Kennedys' Catholic mischance, John John's possible presidential candidacy, etc. she'd rather gang up to crowd me out.... Yet, the top of the bill really is crafty MNI! He's truly at the top of the con-chain: always picking on me, niggling on everything I might have to write, and always failing to argue my points --fairly and squarely. I too find such a fallaciousness pathetic. Nevertheless, all that infowar skullduggery will not prevent me from getting along: the bottomline is still to share information and on-topic opinions with each other, isn't it? Freedom of speech is OUR name of the cybergame, while 'p o w e r l e s s n e s s' is theirs! (Remember the paradigm shift from one-to-many media toward many-to-many webcasting) So, those sweet-talkers can stake us out 24/7, dynamite gen's only a click away! Lippy Gus, your coolest cabbie: Blabbermouths are most welcome aboard! (Hey, giveaways go both ways!)