Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (51097)	8/13/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett	Respond to of 108807

I agree with you X. The world seems to be more unstable today than it was in 1988.

To: epicure who wrote (51097)	8/13/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: Michael M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Hi X! You may have been first to think of the "evil empire" in a beneficial light but far from the first to say so -- at least within my hearing. There is reason to support your view. Opposing it, I would list constant meddling and proxy wars in much of the world (although "little" wars seem to be on the rise v. the wane). Also, it seemed, for a moment there, to offer hope of real nuke disarmament v. the prevailing arms "limitation" agreements which actually increased arsenals (but in "approved" ways). The Bush administration blew it big time, IMO, by not making rapid giant strides in ridding the world of the obscene number of nuke weapons. Would have taken some serious money but real progress seemed possible. This has been compounded by the Clinton administration in more ways than I can count. Between proliferation and the ascendency of the Chinese, a golden door of opportunity has been closed. I don't think it's an "if" thing, I think it's a "when" thing.