Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ORXX - Orex Gold Mines Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sportfish who wrote (411)	8/14/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2392

So...You lost money too? Well not so bad. Usually much more by now and more vocal. TG

To: Sportfish who wrote (411)	8/14/1999 4:41:00 PM
From: Laser	Respond to of 2392

..."Hey... if assholes could fly, this thread would be an international airport! "Gliders", even!.... Look,....try not to flap your arms too much while you're running down the runway ok?...........you look too obvious. BTW, I like GB's dd process as well....he phones Warren....Warren tells him what to post....hey, works for me. ;-)

To: Sportfish who wrote (411)	8/14/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 2392

Sport ... you let the nays ramble on and twist the syntax. I do not want to fight them I just correct their syntax. They get ticked and then they try to find something else to boom the thread with after making attack the messenger type posts. This pump and dump is so missed used it is not even funny. Shorters are infamous for blaming others for what they do. This one is too convenient but I will take each and every point of a naysayer and verify it for accuracy and not some twisted syntax. But nays are valueable. Before Jeff brought out WVLLC I was be lazy and not even doing any research on it because it is not mining and laying domant. Just assets is what I liked. SMMC is trying to get the SMR and SMH claims up and functioning to test the HGP. Orex has nothing but a shell until this deal is closed. This is two seperate companies and I would suspect two seperate acquistions. One may close and the other not and then again neither closes. Until it is in b/w it does not exist regardless. Just doing my thing. But this stock is strange with naysayers. They are attacking every possible scenario. Why is testing the HGP such a major distress for these nays with no interest in the stock? :-) GB

To: Sportfish who wrote (411)	8/14/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2392

This stock is being nayed in accordance with the naysayers guidelines post on another thread. This one is classic example. FYI: ragingbull.com MESSAGE BOARD GUIDELINES USED BY SHORTERS. 1. Be anonymous, of course. 2. Use 10% fact and 90% suggestion in one's posts. Facts give credibility, while suggestion does the "sell." 3. Let others "help" you learn about a stock thereby developing rapport and a support base. 4. Use multiple handles, but develop a unique style for each. 5. Use multiple ISPs. 6. Start each new handle slowly to build acceptance. 7. Occasionally, use two handles to "discuss" an issue. 8. Do not show all your cards at once when slamming a stock. It's a war - it's okay to lose a battle as long as you save enough ammo to win the war. 9. Know your enemies - they will end up being your best weapons. 10. Only slam until the tide starts to turn. Let doubt carry the stock back with the tide. 11. Maintain an appearance of being open-minded, but a slant in either direction is acceptable. 12. Don't appear meek. No one follows the meek. 13. Strike just as your opponent starts to gather momentum, but not before or you lose your sting. 14. Don't worry if people peg you for a slammer. The doubt will remain and that's what you are after. 15. If pegged, put up a brief fight, then let them feel they've won. This puts their guard down within a few days and your other handles can take over from there. 16. When slamming a stock, the intent is to minimize its rise, not to create an instant plunge. 17. To slam a stock requires you only to kill the dream not the company. 18. Use questions to invoke critical thinking and use statements to reinforce. 19. You can be liberal in your questions but be specific and precise in your statements. 20. Don't lie. (Of course, we know most do). 21. When slamming, encourage research beyond calling the company. You know people are far too lazy and it's only doubt you are after, not confirmation. 22. When slamming, discourage people from taking the company's word. Encourage them to seek outside proof. If the company's history is bad, point them there. 23. When slamming, refer to missed deadlines and weak financials. 24. When slamming, if the price rises, blame it on a temporary mass reaction to a press release rather than real interest in the stock. Point out low volume and emphasize the selling. 25. Pretend to share the same concerns by learning what they want to hear. 26. Finally, above all else, BE UNPREDICTABLE. The author says there are many sites devoted to the art of shorting. The routine is always to use more than one alias. Sometimes 3-4 people can create 19-20 and totally take over a board. :-) Thanks JAT. GB