Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gpowell who wrote (14499)	8/14/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: E. Davies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

You have not understood a thing I have written Thats right, I dont. Come on, you can do better than that. You dont have to act like Ahhaha. Explain yourself. If my basic premise is wrong, I'd like to know. Show me a way open access can work using my one example. Eric

To: gpowell who wrote (14499)	8/14/1999 11:11:00 PM
From: KW Wingman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

<There are many problems in my stance for open access - many. but not the ones you have just outlined.> The reasons Eric outlined are more than enough all by themselfs. Most whimps say they are for open access because they think it makes them sound like a free thinking pro consumer type of person. In reality these whimps are just a)AOL / ISP / baby bell competitors and supporters of the copper phone wiring system. (These folks have a good reason to fear cable and ATHM) b)Stupid do gooders, otherwise known as "Commie Pinko Fag Numbskulls" <g> c)Whimps and very old men with faulty logic processors such as Ahhaha is burdened with. d) all of the above The so called "open access" is total BS, it is nothing more than "forced access" and IMO, any fool should be able to see that. Wingman