SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (28211)8/15/1999 9:31:00 AM
From: Jeff Jordan  Respond to of 50167
 



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (28211)8/15/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
ECONOMY ...Keeping the World Safe by Consuming
By WALTER RUSSELL MEAD


LONDON--Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be laid low. That's how the prophet Isaiah described what would happen when the Messiah came; it also describes what's going on in the global economy at the millennium.
Valleys first. East Asian stock markets, which lost up to 90% of their value during the 1997-98 financial crisis, are coming back. By the start of this month, Indonesia's stock market was up 77.5% for the year; South Korea's was up 73.7%. Every major emerging market in Asia has outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500 in 1999. So has Russia. Devastated in August 1998, the Russian economy has done surprisingly well since; in dollar terms, its stock market is up 79% for the year.
The outlook for the euro has also changed. Two weeks ago, most analysts were predicting the euro would continue to sink, perhaps below parity with the dollar. Then it regained its footing and is now well off its lows.
Backing the euro's new strength are signs of accelerating economic revival in the major European economies. Germany's Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder surprised most politicians and delighted German business leaders by calling for sweeping reforms in Germany's expensive social-safety net. The French economy has been chugging along nicely for some time, and French business is confident that the conditions for more growth remain strong.
But while the valleys rise, the mountains sink. U.S. stock markets, the wonder of the world through most of the 1990s, are losing some of their sizzle. The technology-laden Nasdaq is down about 8% from its peak. Internet stocks have been hit even harder, down more than one-third from the height of the frenzy last spring. The disappointing performances of some recent Internet IPOs and a flurry of bad news about day trading (a recent report suggested that 70% of day traders lose money and that day traders would need a 56% return on their portfolios simply to pay commissions and fees) may mean speculative fever is leaving the stock market.
This mix of good and bad news--rallies around the world, shakiness in the United States--speaks volumes about the way the global economy works now. To put it in a nutshell: The U.S. economy keeps the world economy moving; the stress of this mighty effort places strains that leave the United States and the world vulnerable to new shocks.
The United States has been keeping the world moving in two ways. First, by re-engineering its economy into a technology-based service economy, the U.S. is leading the way in the development and adoption of new technologies. That creates value and growth and leads to an investment-based boom. In fact, the U.S. has grown steadily since 1984, with only three quarters of recession in the last 15 years.
Second, the U.S. is keeping the global economy moving by serving as the world's "consumer of last resort." Others make, we buy. Think about what happened after Asia crashed: Asian currencies collapsed, and exports from countries like Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand became much cheaper. U.S. consumers continued to spend, and the U.S. trade deficit shot up to a record $300 billion a year. All those consumers flocking to all those Wal-Marts may have maxed out their credit cards--the U.S. household savings rate has turned negative--but they also saved the world from economic disaster. Asia recovered; Europe started to grow.
However, we are now faced with the consequences of success. Because the United States has been running such large trade deficits for so long, and because our national savings rate is so low, the U.S. needs to attract foreign savings to finance its economic expansion. The wave of Internet and high-tech start-up companies depends on access to cheap capital; start-up companies don't usually earn large profits at the beginning, when their expenses are high. During the last two years, foreign capital flocked into the United States. With Europe stagnant, and Asia and Latin America on the brink, the stock and bond markets of the United States looked like the only smart places to put money.
Hundreds of billions flowed into the U.S., driving the dollar up and interest rates down. The economy boomed, but inflation wasn't a problem. The strong dollar kept import prices low, while the Asian depression reduced global demand for commodities like oil, agricultural products and raw materials, including copper and nickel. Americans got richer: Those with large stock portfolios had large paper profits, and most homeowners saw the value of their houses rise sharply even as mortgage payments fell for those who refinanced.
This was terrific, and helped make the last two years the best in a generation for many Americans. Wages rose for most workers, inflation was low, unemployment was less than 5%.
But now the world seems to be heading into a new phase. Asia's recovery and Europe's growth mean investors can now make more money in their home markets than in the U.S. That reduces demand for the dollar, causing its value to drop against the euro and the yen. With oil prices heading back up, rising 60% in a year, inflationary pressure is building. Even before the Federal Reserve meets to talk about interest rates Aug. 24, rates are rising on open markets. Rates on the 30-year Treasury bond fell to less than 5% at the peak of the financial crisis; they are now back to 6.1%. Mortgage rates are again more than 8%.
All this is bad for stocks and house prices. If the falling dollar plus rising foreign demand for oil and other goods ignites inflation, many households will be looking at a somewhat bleaker economic future: Their houses and stock portfolios will be worth less, and the dollars they earn from work will buy less. Many consumers will have to cut back their spending; the economy will slow.
This could turn ugly fast. Rising interest rates will force stock prices down. That will lead foreigners to sell U.S. stocks and take their money home. That will drive the dollar down, leading more foreigners to liquidate their U.S. assets, driving the dollar down more. Some observers predict that a dollar crisis could lead to a drop of 40% or more in stock prices within 18 months.
Maybe so, but there's more. The world still needs for America to max out its charge cards. If U.S. consumers cut back, we could see another round of economic crisis in Asia and in Latin America, where Mexico, Brazil and Argentina have not yet fully found their feet after the 1997-98 crisis. Japan, in particular, needs the U.S. dollar to be strong: A weak dollar prices Japanese goods out of the U.S. market, and Japan's export-oriented economy would collapse into a depression without U.S. markets.
For now at least, the rest of the world is trapped. Since global prosperity depends on U.S. consumers going to the mall, the rest of the world must conspire to prop up the dollar--and lend us the money to keep the cycle turning.
How long this can last is anyone's guess. It looks unstable: How can the world economy depend on the consuming power of the world's greatest debtor for long? But the United States has been a debtor since the Reagan administration, and, so far, we haven't suffered any of the ill effects that doomsters prophesy.
The country that suffers most has been Japan: The world's greatest creditor nation has suffered 10 years of stagnation while we feckless debtors have gone from strength to strength.
"Sin and sin boldly!" Martin Luther wrote to one of his wavering colleagues during the Protestant Reformation. Maybe we should update that advice: U.S. consumers should spend boldly to keep the world economy on the march.*
- - -

Walter Russell Mead, a Contributing Editor to Opinion, Is a Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. he Is the Author of "Mortal Splendor: the American Empire in Transition."



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (28211)8/15/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Thank you for the invite to post this week.

First let me assure you that I have only one identity on SI and even use the same identity on other boards that I rarely post on anymore. I sign all my posts Lee at the end but my identity is always L3akaL3 or L3_aka_L3. Lee is someone different from myself and a quick e-mail or PM to SI Bob can verify this.

As to using the futures for trading instead of the DOW, I am in total agreement however since one of the main and best in my opinion posters on the other thread developed his system based on the DOW, we all try to adapt to a standard and he prefers the DOW since it is the index that most people equate to the market. I agree that it is a fairly useless index since it is so skewed as I eluded to in an earlier post. While the market was down around 10% the DOW was not due to the UK buy out/merger. UK will be replaced on the index by another stock, probably one out of favor right now so that the DOW will have "locked in" the higher level and will get an extra boost as this stock recovers. That is why I actually do not call the market bullish or bearish based on indexes but instead use what the majority of stocks I track, the Advance decline ratio and various other indicators are doing to decide which way to lean. When I get the rare chance to day trade, I use the futures and also camp out lurking the futures thread. I keep the SPU running on q-charts but since I don't often get to trade during the day prefer to actively trade the OEX, SPX, sector indexes and on some occasions stock options. ( I also don't have the huge capital to risk that is required to trade the SPOO since the Air Force doesnt paythat well <ggg>) It is not a large leap to convert targets in futures to the "standard" indexes since day to day, they tend to follow each other and the "average" investor/trader trades stocks. Options traders are a minority and the futures traders are an even more rare breed. Heck most of those that contact me don't even short stocks or have option accounts so they can only trade long on regular stocks. I/we therefor try to speak in terms that the average J6P can understand.

Again, let me assure you that I am only one person and "Lee" is someone else so I can not answer for any posts from him. As to our being rude to Wei, maybe we were a bit harsh and I honestly don't recall the conversation back then. I do remember that he showed up out of no where, near the top of the market and was extremely bullish as we were seeing the topping signs which proved to be correct. I believe this thread was very bullish at that time and it proved to the the exact top that week when he hit us for being too bearish. We didn't know his track record or even who he was and we often get hypsters lacking thought or analysis crashing the board poking fun at us not understanding our posts. I did follow him for a couple weeks through PMs and came to the conclusion he did not fall in that category.

We are often taken as always bearish since we all mostly trade the extreme short term swings. This means that half of the time, we are short since short term cycles tend to swing every 3 days or so. We often take the contrarian view to keep people's eyes open to alternate possibilities also when speaking longer term. This is the case with my target on the Bond rate. You pointed out I said it could go to 6.5% but if you read a bit deeper, I also said the first swing was to 6.15% ( it reached 6.2) then this most recent swing's target was 6.25% (which was hit) and the longer term possibility was 6.5% before a re-evaluation would be required due to the long term strong resistance at that level. I believe we will pull back to 5.9% here in the next few weeks. At my site, I often keep both a bullish and bearish set of forks on my charts so that both possibilities are always represented. You may note that we were getting more bullish as the recent pullback was ending and that we tend to get more bearish as the bullish trends top out. It is too easy to drop one's guard the higher the market goes or to get more shorts going as the corrections run their course. This was most evident by the extreme put call ratio at the July top and low VIX since almost everyone was buying calls and no one was going short at the top. That is why we tend to post the alternate views more fiercely at those times. The bounces/drops are often the most violent at the turning points and we all want to be prepared and want others to be the same.

I have not finished my homework yet and am already a day and a half late updating my site since I am busy with other things so I have no real targets yet. I see a good possibility of SPX 1370, OEX 725 and 2725 NASDAQ but these are farther out targets so I will have to reel them in to get an end of week forecast. I also am not convinced that we are necessarily out of the woods yet to go whole hog bullish. Many stocks and sector indexes stalled or reversed at important resistance levels and or 200 DMAs. Until these are broken, there is always the possibility that this is a bounce due to temporaily bullish news and the extreme over sold levels we had up until Aug 6th. As Foreign markets gain strength, we will lose some liquidity as foreign money leaves our market to return to their shores and J6P is not putting in as much fund money as usual. Liquidity drives this market and outflows can impede our progress even if everything is A-OK. I do beleive we will have a higher DOW before the end of the year but September is a historically bad month for the US market so keeping ones guard up the next few weeks is still a wise choice IMO. I am guardely bullish but PPI reports are trailing reports and AG does not use these in his decisions. A rate hike is almost certain though the Bond market has already priced this in so we can climb now. As to inflation, of course there is inflation, oil is up 50%, the CRBis climbing as is corn prices. Beef will climb due to the Drought and labor wages are starting to creep up so there is no question about it in my mind. The real question is will it be enough to hold us back. I doubt it for now. There is over a month of stored up buying pressure and we NEED a bounce. Some of my best charts are still showing that we should have dropped to OEX 645 before reversing back up for real so I am still on guard that this may be a temporary bounce lasting a couple weeks only. I keep many charts and some of these have excellent track records and point downward still at this time. I also however did post the bounce August 6th and am totally open to that possibility. I will as always watch teh market's reaction to critical levels and then base my longer term view based on those reactions.

I will watch the breadth of this rally and gauge the markets strength from it. I am curious as to how much cash is really available to the buyers and how many shorts are still out there ready to get squeezed out adding fuel to the upturn. Time will tell and I will react accordingly.

Best of Luck,

Lee (but not he other Lee <g>)



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (28211)8/15/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: cog  Respond to of 50167
 
Ike, Just want to thank you for your posts. I am a fairly new investor and trader and it is very refreshing to be able to learn from someone who has something worthwhile to teach. All of the hype and false information given out on the internet and CNBC can become very confusing so just want to thank you and ask you to please continue to post.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (28211)8/16/1999 10:38:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Broadcom, Semiconductor Maker, Unveils Chip to Process Video and Data
By Scott Lanman

Broadcom Unveils Networking Chip to Process Video, Data

Irvine, California, Aug. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Broadcom Corp.,
the No. 1 maker of semiconductors for cable modems, introduced a
chip that lets computer-networking equipment process video,
telephone and Internet data more efficiently at a lower cost.

Broadcom's StrataSwitch chip, costing about $100, performs
functions of chip sets costing $500 to $1,000. It would be used
in switches that receive information from computers in a network
and transmit it to other computers or switches.

Broadcom's shares have rocketed more than 10-fold since the
company went public in April 1998, benefiting from demand for
chips used in high-speed office networks and cable modems. Its
revenue more than quintupled last year to $203.1 million.
Broadcom hopes to place the chips in the estimated 3.3 million
high-speed switches that will be sold next year.

The chip speeds functions such as videoconferencing, using
the Internet for telephone calls and online-transaction
processing, said Marty Colombatto, vice president and general
manager of Broadcom's networking-business unit. It contains about
60 million transistors, more than six times as many as an Intel
Corp. Pentium III processor.

Broadcom, whose customers include top networking-equipment
makers like Cisco Systems Inc. and 3Com Corp., expects the first
products featuring the chip to be available by the end of the
year. It took about a year for engineers at Maverick Networks,
which Broadcom bought in May for $165 million in stock, to
develop the chip, Broadcom said.