Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (8022)	8/15/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: bearcub	Respond to of 9818

this is the best excrement you can lob? re: the GAO, i guess you'd have to read more than the cover page title of their various Y2K ndustry recomendations to find any substance. we all know are very aware you are so busy bending over lob-ing according to your SI profile animation heretofore referenced, that you constrain yourself to cover pages (art?) only. i won't do your research for you, ron. janelle and i have already done so for ourselves so we declare GAO Y2k recommendations by industry are easier to find than the yellen and gramley public speeches 'opps' regarding the minimum 11 banking banking holidays planned to cover the 1999 calendar year end into the new year. see, that is the trouble with you d.c. boys, you think if you lob enough excrement to obscure the public's right to know and prepare, you are doing greater good stuff. BARF! Why don't you go find a GAO Y2k recommendation that you specifically have difficulty with, post its URL for all to see, and then explain away the motivation for the GAO's specific concern, the factors that entered into their thinking, (you know: deepcover stuff) and why koskinen, bennett, and dodd have it covered, assessed, remediated and independently verified and tested. provide us a timeline of the utterance, the government or private industry response, the specific remediation date, and theindependently verification date and who was the 'verifier.' then we'll move to the next GAO utterance, until we've used up all your vapid arguments and excuses of prejudice and political agendae. until then, these GAO Y2K recommendations are still open ended muted testimony, to the gapping wounds to the american infrastructure and the chaos and death directly ahead. tell us now before you join the mass graves phenomenae and end up permanently out of lob. go ahead, ron, you're human. tell us what it is about Y2K GAO Hhumans who wrote those recommendations per industry that you don't like? this should be interesting.