Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator from New York? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chalu2 who wrote (1034)	8/15/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: C Kahn	Respond to of 3389

chalu2, I would say without a doubt that McDonald's had pretty good lawyers, too, who probably would have bulldozed a lawyer who wasn't very sharp. But there other factors to be considered, as I'm sure you are very much aware of. The jury has many restrictions to consider, and because of this may make a decision that doesn't necessarily reflect what they personally believe to be true. I agree that McDonald's must have pretty good lawyers, which makes me wonder if there are other factors that they had to take into consideration when making their case. I'm just speculating here, but I can imagine people coming out of the woodwork, who would testify that they found rodents, insects, and God only knows what else in McDonalds food. Just my opinion. C Kahn