Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.horn who wrote (2004)	8/15/1999 4:40:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

I am starting to think that there is more to this story than meets the eye. This guy is involved heavily with two non reporting BB companies, one that starts with an X, the other with a Z....hmmmmm, this means they can stall the public until June for their Form 10's, if they are ever filed. We have a guy who admits to using an offshore corporation to do his trades thru, (also claiming to be offshore himself, which I seriously doubt as his attorney is in NYC), while accusing me of being a tax cheat. So far, he is involved in PUMPING and DUMPING ZSUN shamelessly touting it all over the web, and accusing me of same, Using an offshore account to defraud the IRS, but calling them on me, a law abiding American with nothing to hide, and someone on the other thread uncovered a Reg S on one of his stocks, the worst fraud of all on the shareholder. but the thing that doesn't add up, (other than his obvious psychosis), is that he is way too high profile to be this involved in scamming; which leads me to my next conclusion, there is a Frank Goelo listed in the Cayman's and a Francois Goelo, and everyone assumes it is the same person. I am starting to think that there is a father and son thing going on here, and that the father hasn't a clue as to the liability the kid is getting him into. nothing else makes sense here, unless he is just a sociopath, because the person posting here like a maniac all weekend couldn't possibly be smart enough to have amassed any wealth, especially in this game; Well, anyway, that thought came to mind. So Horn, I am infirm, so I have a reason to be in all day, what about you? Hopefully you are floating on sailboat somewhere. Oh, andthat leads me to another clue, his email address at unikay is a fake, since an email sentthere came back, but the other one, sea gem, leads me to think that is the naem of his fathers boat. Each time he posts, he ties the noose a little tighter. Anyway, if all these personal attacks havent earned him a few weeks off SI, then I have given up completely on the system. Steve

To: c.horn who wrote (2004)	8/15/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Respond to of 2513

Be my GUEST: his name is Eric Fader at 212-907 0700. BTW, I am sending copies of your post by e-mail to ZSUN and XNET. I am sure you're aware that ZSUN has a current Lawsuit against nine posters on SI that have issued Libelous Statement similar to yours... Message 10953523 Attorneys for ZSUN are in Seattle: WEISS, JENSEN, ELLIS & HOWARD and you can view the entire filing in post #7976 on RB... F. Goelo + + +

To: c.horn who wrote (2004)	8/15/1999 5:30:00 PM
From: Scoobah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Maybe Francois will tell everyone about these dishonorable mentions; financialweb.com Thanks to the Stock Detective's vigilant readers and a bevy of stock promoters, we're flush with tips about stocks that most people should think twice about before investing. All them may not warrant full Stinky Stock status, although we're sure a few inevitably will come from this list. Until they reach that benchmark, Stock Detective wants to warn readers about stocks that should have you seeing "red." What sets them apart? Take your pick: volatility, high volume, wild price swings, outrageous claims, a stack of vacuous press releases, or maybe a share price that doesn't seem to add up from the sum of the company's parts. XNET is the latest company laying claim to China's allegedly vast, untapped pool of Internet users. Xin Net and its subsidiaries say they will offer TV set-top Internet access as well as online content. Xin Net, based in Vancouver, B.C., says its operating arm in China, Xin Hai, has licenses to provide Internet access in 10 major Chinese cities, which combined give the company access to less than 10 percent of China's population. Xin Net also is up against some well-heeled competition. Earlier this month, China.com went public and raised $84 million, giving it probably the deepest pockets of all the China ISP/Portal site wannabes. Xin Net's bankroll pales in comparison. According to its initial filing with the SEC, the 10SB reveals a struggling company with very little cash or commitments. After two years, Xin Net has a mere 25,000 Internet subscribers. Hardly the stuff Internet empires are made of. And, prior to a $5.5 million private placement, the company had only a trickle of revenue from operations. And, although the 5.5 million-share offering brought in some much-needed cash, in the long-term it could dilute current shareholders' holdings. According to documents filed with the SEC, investors who bought into the private placement at $1 per unit have dibs on two more shares of Xin Net stock at $2 and $5, respectively. One curious note on Xin Net's income statement is the inclusion of depreciation and amortization - which typically shows up on the cash flow statement. Inclusion on the income statement inflates Xin Net's bottom line by more than $45,000 through the third quarter of 1998, and a similar amount for fiscal 1997. <<Oh, did we mention that one of the investors in the private placement (120,000 shares) apparently is one of ZiaSun's biggest fans and an investor in that company as well?>> As always, tread lightly……………………. The Stock Detective