SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ED_L who wrote (9853)8/16/1999 9:19:00 PM
From: dennis foster  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11149
 
To All,
I just switched from WOW to Metastock. When I update
my QP2 data it does not update my Metastock files.
Anyone know what I have to do to fix this problem?

Thanks
Dennis



To: ED_L who wrote (9853)8/17/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Monty Lenard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11149
 
Ed, There are many more experienced scanners out here but let me give you my 2 cents worth on the scan. I like it because I think stocks are more predictable around these Major MA's and like to TRADE them above and below. If you will notice MOST of them have the same basic patterns when they first break the MA and when they first try to go back through that MA and when they first succeed in moving above that MA.

Anyway, again I personally like to TRADE them there and your scan does a nice job of finding those.

Monty



To: ED_L who wrote (9853)8/17/1999 7:09:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow  Respond to of 11149
 
Interesting scan, Ed.
I tend to average three lengths of an indicator a lot because it, as Chande showed
back when, gives the equivalent of an adaptive version on the cheap.
Hadn't thought of using the idea for max, but your
MAXX:= (max(-1,-35,cl)+ max(-1,-25,cl)+ max(-1,-18,cl))/3;
accomplishes that -- it behave more like the 18-day component when
a shorter trend is in place.

Looks like you've tuned it quite a bit already, but you might try relaxing some
of the conditions and sorting on them to see what might improve it.
The one backtest [below] that I ran didn't give any big winners but
these are trying times :o)

Bob
[I pasted the backtest version of your scan below the results.]
----
ACTN,0.04,-30,07/02/1999
NEON,0.10,-30,07/02/1999
ONHN,0.03,-30,07/02/1999
PRGS,0.02,-30,07/02/1999
VMSI,0.00,-30,07/02/1999
--------
//input = "100k.lst";
issuetype common;
daystoload=400;
integer tbar; tbar := -30; /// set here *********
output="Pullback-30.lst";
float AvgC200,AvgC3,AvgC3,MAXX,Slope,UTX;
AvgC200:=MovAvg(tbar,200,CL);
Slope:=(AvgC200 -MovAvg(tbar-2,200,CL))/2;
AvgC3:=MovAvg(tbar,3,CL);
MAXXX := (max(tbar-1,tbar-35,cl)+max(tbar-1,tbar-25,cl)+max(tbar-1,tbar-18,cl))/3;
UTX:= 1.15*AvgC200;

if Close(tbar) > 5 and InstHold > 42 and Slope > 0 and MAXX > 1.15*AvgC200
and Close(tbar) < 0.9*MAXX and AvgC3 > 0.95*AvgC200 and MovAvg(tbar,7,vol) > 145000
and Vol(tbar) > 1.08*Vol(-1) and Low(tbar) > Low(-1)
and MACD(tbar) > MACD(tbar-1) and Low(tbar) < UTX then

println symbol,",",Slope:3:2,",",tbar,",",date(tbar);
endif;