SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (18045)8/16/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: Handshake™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Hmmm...I give up which one????
There's not that many that are Canadian, so there is probably a short list of "insiders"..looks like you're afraid (as usual) to publicly state what you think you know!!!



To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (18045)8/16/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: John7777  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
More insinuations, and no evidence to back it up.

WLD, there are no off limit areas that I will not go with you. Especially with "evidence" from your very lips!!

You also left last week without answering some pressing questions.

Did you or did you not tell KMT that your mother lost a substantial amount of money with a Vancouver "firm".

Does her loses reflect your ill feeling towards these 2 companies.

Why haven't you taken legal action, since you "want" them in court so much.

Why do you think bashing other shareholders and there investment is redemption for her loses.

Lets start with those.

Since you feel free to insinuate many unfounded accusations, you can prepare for some to come your way. No boundries.

The choice is yours!

john

To: John7777
From: Win-Lose-Draw
Friday, Apr 23 1999 2:08PM ET

LOL! You're a trip. I'm quite happy comparing my winnings on NPEC against anyone
elses.



To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (18045)8/19/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: Grateful Reaper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
"which MDHM insider is currently being investigated by the BC Securities Commission?"

WLD, I'd like to know what you mean by "investigated."

"Investigate" is a term which is often used rather loosely, especially when someone is trying to evoke an emotional response.

I would assume that if anyone sends a letter of complaint (no matter how frivolous) to the BC Securities Commission, they are required to "investigate" that complaint, although the investigation may amount to nothing more than a cursory review of the letter.

Is that what you mean by "investigated", WLD? You sent a letter to the Securities Commission complaining about someone associated with MDHM? Do you really think you can scare anyone with this crap?