Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Ashton Technology (ASTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (2330)	8/16/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: mst2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4443

AG: As usual, you're facts are wrong: techstocks.com Read the middle paragraph very carefully. It expresses my view that even if true insiders were selling part of their positions, it might not be meaningful depending on how much they sell. As was the case with Ken Pasternak at NITE (an illustrative example I have used about 10 times on this message board). Let me add something. Even Fred Rittereiser's sale debunks one of your more popular theories - his 144 was filed BEFORE his sale actually went through, and then a Form 4 was filed. You have this (FALSE) theory that all 144's are filed simultaneous with the sales they reflect (as "planned sales") -- Fred's Form 4 reveals that, once again, your theories as to "how things really are" are about as lame as your diligence on ATG. I do love the stock by the way - and in the next 5-10 days, you will perhaps begin to understand why. MST a